Compare IIIF150 R2022 vs Xiaomi Poco C31
| Name | IIIF150 R2022 | Xiaomi Poco C31 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 313177 | 114385 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio G95 | MediaTek Helio G35 |
| Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 6.53 " |
| Resolution | 2460x1080 | 1600x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 8300 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 350 g | g |
| Dimensions | 175.7 x 84 x 15.5 mm | mm |
| Price | 173.10€ ($203.20) See Details |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Poco C31: Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 8/128Gb - Compare Xiaomi 12T Pro Daniel Arsham Edition - Compare Xiaomi Mi 10S 12/256Gb - Compare |
IIIF150 R2022 vs Xiaomi Poco C31: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the IIIF150 R2022’s camera vs Xiaomi Poco C31’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | IIIF150 R2022 | Xiaomi Poco C31 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | Four LEDs | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
IIIF150 R2022 vs Xiaomi Poco C31: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the IIIF150 R2022 vs Xiaomi Poco C31, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | IIIF150 R2022 | Xiaomi Poco C31 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 8300 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
IIIF150 R2022 vs Xiaomi Poco C31: Antutu benchmark comparison.
IIIF150 R2022 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 313177 score points which is 173.79% faster than the Xiaomi Poco C31, which got 114385. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
IIIF150 R2022 vs Xiaomi Poco C31: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
IIIF150 R2022 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 427 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi Poco C31 which got 175, it is 144.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1550 vs 682 (127.27% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between IIIF150 R2022 and Xiaomi Poco C31? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 R2022 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 173.79% faster in the Antutu test (198792 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 1600x720.
- More battery capacity: 8300mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 3300mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take IIIF150 R2022 (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Poco C31 (advantages)
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Poco C31 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
IIIF150 R2022 related comparisons
- Compare F150 R2022 vs OUKITEL WP17
- Compare F150 R2022 vs Ulefone Power Armor 13
- Compare IIIF150 R2022 vs IIIF150 Air1 Pro
- Compare F150 R2022 vs F150 H2022
- Compare F150 R2022 vs UMIDIGI Bison GT
Xiaomi Poco C31 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Poco M3 vs Xiaomi Poco C31
- Compare Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco C31
- Compare Xiaomi Poco C31 vs Xiaomi Mi A3
- Compare Xiaomi Poco C31 vs Xiaomi Poco C50
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 9T vs Xiaomi Poco C31