Compare IIIF150 R2022 vs Xiaomi Poco M3 4/128Gb
| Name | IIIF150 R2022 | Xiaomi Poco M3 4/128Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 313177 | 180575 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio G95 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 |
| Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 6.53 " |
| Resolution | 2460x1080 | 2340x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Four cameras |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 8300 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 350 g | 198 g |
| Dimensions | 175.7 x 84 x 15.5 mm | 162,3 x 77,3 x 9,6 mm |
| Price | 172.34€ ($203.20) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Poco M3 4/128Gb: Xiaomi Mi 9 T 6/128Gb - Compare Xiaomi 12 Lite 8/256GB - Compare Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 6/128Gb - Compare |
IIIF150 R2022 vs Xiaomi Poco M3 4/128Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the IIIF150 R2022’s camera vs Xiaomi Poco M3’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp sensor and the 48Mp Samsung GM1 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | IIIF150 R2022 | Xiaomi Poco M3 4/128Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM1 | |
| Flash | Four LEDs | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
IIIF150 R2022 vs Xiaomi Poco M3 4/128Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the IIIF150 R2022 vs Xiaomi Poco M3, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | IIIF150 R2022 | Xiaomi Poco M3 4/128Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 8300 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 8-9 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
IIIF150 R2022 vs Xiaomi Poco M3 4/128Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
IIIF150 R2022 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 313177 score points which is 73.43% faster than the Xiaomi Poco M3 4/128Gb, which got 180575. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
IIIF150 R2022 vs Xiaomi Poco M3 4/128Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
IIIF150 R2022 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 427 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi Poco M3 4/128Gb which got 321, it is 33.02% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1550 vs 1332 (16.37% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between IIIF150 R2022 and Xiaomi Poco M3 4/128Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 R2022 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 73.43% faster in the Antutu test (132602 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp compared to 48Mp Samsung GM1
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 8Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 2340x1080.
- More battery capacity: 8300mAh vs 6000mAh (a difference of 2300mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take IIIF150 R2022 (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Poco M3 4/128Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 152 grams less (198 vs 350).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Poco M3 4/128Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
IIIF150 R2022 related comparisons
- Compare F150 R2022 vs OUKITEL WP17
- Compare F150 R2022 vs Ulefone Power Armor 13
- Compare IIIF150 R2022 vs IIIF150 Air1 Pro
- Compare F150 R2022 vs F150 H2022
- Compare F150 R2022 vs UMIDIGI Bison GT
Xiaomi Poco M3 4/128Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 vs Xiaomi Poco M3
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 12C vs Xiaomi Poco M3
- Compare Xiaomi Poco M3 vs Xiaomi Poco C40
- Compare Xiaomi Poco M3 vs Xiaomi Poco M3
- Compare Realme 8i vs Xiaomi Poco M3