Compare Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Iocean X8
Name | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | Iocean X8 |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Antutu benchmark | 37524 | |
CPU | MediaTek MT6753 | |
Diagonal size | 5 " | " |
Resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
RAM | 3 Gb | Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 16 GB | 32 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb | |
Rear camera | 13 Mp | Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | Mp |
Battery | 2800 mAh | 2700 mAh |
Wireless charging | ||
Network | 4 G | G |
Sim cards | ||
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | |
NFC | No | |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | |
Notifications Led | Yes | |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | |
Operating system (OS) | Android 6.0 | |
Material | Metal and plastic | |
Weight | 140 g | g |
Dimensions | 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm | mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: |
Discontinued.
View all Iocean models here
Alternatives to the Iocean X8: |
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Iocean X8: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vernee Thor’s camera vs Iocean X8’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | Iocean X8 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 13 Mp | Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | LED flash | |
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | Mp |
Flash | No |
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Iocean X8: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vernee Thor vs Iocean X8, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | Iocean X8 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 2800 mAh | 2700 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 5-6 days | |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | |
Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | |
Talk time | 20 hours | |
Fast charging | Yes | |
Wireless charging |
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Iocean X8: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 37524 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Iocean X8, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Iocean X8: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 116 points score in "Single-core" of against the Iocean X8 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 604 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vernee Thor 3/16Gb and Iocean X8? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 2800mAh vs 2700mAh (a difference of 100mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Iocean X8 (advantages)
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1920x1080 vs 1280x720.
Why it is better not to take Iocean X8 (disadvantages)
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Vernee Thor vs Doogee X5 Max Pro
- Compare Leagoo KIICAA Power vs Vernee Thor
Iocean X8 related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs OUKITEL U20 Plus
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4 Pro vs OUKITEL U20 Plus
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs Doogee X5 Max Pro
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus