Compare Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb vs Kenxinda 6A
| Name | Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb | Kenxinda 6A |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 263117 | 21533 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G | UNISOC SC7731 |
| Diagonal size | 6.47 " | 5.5 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 960x480 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 2 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 1 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 8 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Camera | Five cameras | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 5260 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 3 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 8.1 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | 208 g | 145 g |
| Dimensions | 157.8 x 74.2 x 9.7 mm | 147 x 71,3 x 9,2 mm |
| Price | 367.09€ ($430.09) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Kenxinda models here
Alternatives to the Kenxinda 6A: |
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb vs Kenxinda 6A: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi CC9 Pro’s camera vs Kenxinda 6A’s camera, see the difference between the 108Mp Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX sensor and the 5Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb | Kenxinda 6A |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb vs Kenxinda 6A: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi CC9 Pro vs Kenxinda 6A, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb | Kenxinda 6A |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5260 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 1,5-2 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb vs Kenxinda 6A: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 263117 score points which is 1121.92% faster than the Kenxinda 6A, which got 21533. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb vs Kenxinda 6A: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 549 points score in "Single-core" of against the Kenxinda 6A which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1771 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb and Kenxinda 6A? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1121.92% faster in the Antutu test (241584 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX compared to 5Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Samsung S5KGD1 vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 960x480.
- More battery capacity: 5260mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 2760mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Kenxinda 6A (advantages)
- Best weight: 63 grams less (145 vs 208).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Kenxinda 6A (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 9 vs Xiaomi CC9 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi CC9 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi 10X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi CC9 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
- Compare Xiaomi CC9 Pro vs Huawei Honor 10X
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Max vs Xiaomi CC9 Pro
Kenxinda 6A related comparisons
- Compare Kenxinda 6A vs YU FLY F9
- Compare Kenxinda W55 vs Kenxinda 6A
- Compare BLUBOO D6 Lite vs Kenxinda 6A
- Compare Kingzone C5 vs Kenxinda 6A
- Compare Kingzone A5i vs Kenxinda 6A