Compare LeEco Cool1 3/32Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | LeEco Cool1 3/32Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 82073 | 38695 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 5.5 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 3 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX258 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 4060 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | ||
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 6.0 | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Metal | Metal |
| Weight | 173 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 152.0 x 74.8 x 8.2 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all LeEco models here
Alternatives to the LeEco Cool1 3/32Gb: LeEco Le 2 3/64Gb - Compare LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
LeEco Cool1 3/32Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the LeEco Cool1’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp Sony IMX258 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | LeEco Cool1 3/32Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX258 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
LeEco Cool1 3/32Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the LeEco Cool1 vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | LeEco Cool1 3/32Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4060 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging |
LeEco Cool1 3/32Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
LeEco Cool1 3/32Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 82073 score points which is 112.10% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
LeEco Cool1 3/32Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
LeEco Cool1 3/32Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 603 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between LeEco Cool1 3/32Gb and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the LeEco Cool1 3/32Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 112.10% faster in the Antutu test (43378 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp Sony IMX258 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 2Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1920x1080 vs 1280x720.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take LeEco Cool1 3/32Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have fast charging support
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 24 grams less (149 vs 173).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4060mAh (a difference of 960mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
LeEco Cool1 3/32Gb related comparisons
- Compare LeEco Cool1 vs Xiaomi Redmi 4 Pro
- Compare LeEco Cool1 vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare LeEco Cool1 vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare LeEco Cool1 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X
- Compare LeEco Cool1 vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus