0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Meizu M8C vs UMI eMax mini

Meizu M8C vs UMI eMax mini Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Meizu M8C with UMI eMax mini.

Name Meizu M8C UMI eMax mini
Meizu M8C UMI eMax mini
Antutu benchmark 33103
CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 Qualcomm Snapdragon 615
Diagonal size 5.45 " 5 "
Resolution 1440x720 1920x1080
Multi-touch (number of touches) 5 5
RAM 2 Gb 2 Gb
Bezel-less Yes No
ROM 16 GB 16 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb
Rear camera 13 Mp 13 Mp
Camera Single camera Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 8 Mp
Battery 3070 mAh 3050 mAh
Wireless charging No
Network 4 G G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes
NFC No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led Yes
Fingerprint's scanner No
Operating system (OS) Android 7.1
Material Plastic
Weight 140 g 130 g
Dimensions 146.4 x 70 x 8.5 mm 139.8 x 69.6 x 8.9 mm
  Price Discontinued. View all Meizu models here
Alternatives to the Meizu M8C:
Meizu M10 - Compare
Meizu 18s 12/256GB - Compare
Meizu 18x 8/128GB - Compare
Discontinued. View all UMI models here
Alternatives to the UMI eMax mini:

Meizu M8C vs UMI eMax mini: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Meizu M8C’s camera vs UMI eMax mini’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Meizu M8C UMI eMax mini
Rear camera 13 Mp 13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 8 Mp
Flash No

Meizu M8C vs UMI eMax mini: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Meizu M8C vs UMI eMax mini, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Meizu M8C UMI eMax mini
Battery 3070 mAh 3050 mAh
Type Non-removable Removable
Stand-by time 5-6 days
Battery Life 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 6-7 hours
Talk time 25 hours
Fast charging No
Wireless charging No

Meizu M8C vs UMI eMax mini: Antutu benchmark comparison. Meizu M8C vs UMI eMax mini: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Meizu M8C in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 33103 score points which is 100.00% faster than the UMI eMax mini, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Meizu M8C
5.45 inches (1440x720) Curved Glass / Snapdragon 425 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 3070mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
UMI eMax mini
5" (1920x1080) / Snapdragon 615 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 3050mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

Meizu M8C vs UMI eMax mini: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Meizu M8C in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 126 points score in "Single-core" of against the UMI eMax mini which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 427 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Meizu M8C
5.45 inches (1440x720) Curved Glass / Snapdragon 425 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 3070mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
UMI eMax mini
5" (1920x1080) / Snapdragon 615 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 3050mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

What is the difference between Meizu M8C and UMI eMax mini? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Meizu M8C (advantages)

  • More battery capacity: 3070mAh vs 3050mAh (a difference of 20mAh).

Why it is better not to take Meizu M8C (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the UMI eMax mini (advantages)

  • Best weight: 10 grams less (130 vs 140).
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 1920x1080 vs 1440x720.

Why it is better not to take UMI eMax mini (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Meizu M8C related comparisons

UMI eMax mini related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.38/5 of 16
Frequent comparisons