Compare Nokia 2.2 vs Nokia 3.1
| Name | Nokia 2.2 | Nokia 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 65499 | 41077 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio A22 | MediaTek MT6750 |
| Diagonal size | 5.71 " | 5.2 " |
| Resolution | 1520x720 | 1440x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
| RAM | 2 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 3000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | No | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 8.0 (Oreo) |
| Material | Plastic | Metal frame and plastic case |
| Weight | 153 g | 138 g |
| Dimensions | 146 x 70.6 x 9.3 mm | 146.3 x 68.7 x 8.7 mm |
| Price | 99.25€ ($106.14) See Details | 69.95€ ($74.81) See Details |
Nokia 2.2 vs Nokia 3.1: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Nokia 2.2’s camera vs Nokia 3.1’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Nokia 2.2 | Nokia 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Nokia 2.2 vs Nokia 3.1: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Nokia 2.2 vs Nokia 3.1, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Nokia 2.2 | Nokia 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 3000 mAh |
| Type | Removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 1,5-2 days | 1,5-2 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | 6-7 hours |
| Talk time | 20 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Nokia 2.2 vs Nokia 3.1: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Nokia 2.2 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 65499 score points which is 59.45% faster than the Nokia 3.1, which got 41077. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Nokia 2.2 vs Nokia 3.1: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Nokia 2.2 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 156 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia 3.1 which got 121, it is 28.93% faster. In "Multi-core" score 563 vs 505 (11.49% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Nokia 2.2 and Nokia 3.1? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 2.2 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 59.45% faster in the Antutu test (24422 score difference).
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1520x720 vs 1440x720.
Why it is better not to take Nokia 2.2 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 3.1 (advantages)
- Best weight: 15 grams less (138 vs 153).
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Nokia 3.1 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Nokia 2.2 related comparisons
- Compare Nokia 2.2 vs Nokia C1
- Compare Nokia 2.2 vs Nokia 1.4
- Compare Nokia 2.2 vs Nokia C2
- Compare Nokia X6 vs Nokia 2.2
- Compare Nokia 8.1 vs Nokia 2.2
Nokia 3.1 related comparisons
- Compare Nokia 3.2 vs Nokia 3.1
- Compare Nokia 6.1 vs Nokia 3.1
- Compare Nokia 8.1 vs Nokia 3.1
- Compare Nokia 8 vs Nokia 3.1
- Compare Nokia 7.1 vs Nokia 3.1