Compare LG K50 vs Nokia 2.3
Name | LG K50 | Nokia 2.3 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 76588 | 69311 |
CPU | MediaTek Helio P22 | MediaTek Helio A22 |
Diagonal size | 6.26 " | 6.2 " |
Resolution | 1520x720 | 1520x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
RAM | 3 Gb | 2 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
Rear camera | 13 Mp | 13 Mp |
Camera | Dual Camera | Dual Camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 3500 mAh | 4000 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Network | 4 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | No | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | No | No |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
Material | Plastic | Plastic |
Weight | 160 g | 183 g |
Dimensions | 161,3 x 77 x 8,7 mm | 157.7 x 75.4 x 8.7 mm |
Price | 121.15€ ($129.98) See Details | 116.38€ ($124.87) See Details |
LG K50 vs Nokia 2.3: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the LG K50’s camera vs Nokia 2.3’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | LG K50 | Nokia 2.3 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 13 Mp | 13 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | LED flash | Dual LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
LG K50 vs Nokia 2.3: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the LG K50 vs Nokia 2.3, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | LG K50 | Nokia 2.3 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 3500 mAh | 4000 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
Battery Life | 1,5-2 days | 2-3 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 6-7 hours | 8-9 hours |
Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | No |
Wireless charging | No | No |
LG K50 vs Nokia 2.3: Antutu benchmark comparison.
LG K50 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 76588 score points which is 10.50% faster than the Nokia 2.3, which got 69311. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
LG K50 vs Nokia 2.3: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
LG K50 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 161 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia 2.3 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 794 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between LG K50 and Nokia 2.3? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the LG K50 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 10.50% faster in the Antutu test (7277 score difference).
- Best weight: 23 grams less (160 vs 183).
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 13Mp vs 5Mp .
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take LG K50 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 2.3 (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 3500mAh (a difference of 500mAh).
Why it is better not to take Nokia 2.3 (disadvantages)
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
LG K50 related comparisons
- Compare Realme Z7 vs LG K50
- Compare LG K40 vs LG K50
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 11 vs LG K50
- Compare Doogee S60 vs LG K50
- Compare Vivo Z6 vs LG K50
Nokia 2.3 related comparisons
- Compare Lenovo A7 vs Nokia 2.3
- Compare OUKITEL C19 vs Nokia 2.3
- Compare Nokia 6.1 vs Nokia 2.3
- Compare Ulefone Note 9 vs Nokia 2.3
- Compare Cubot J9 vs Nokia 2.3