0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare UMIDIGI A9 vs Nokia 2.3

UMIDIGI A9 vs Nokia 2.3 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of UMIDIGI A9 with Nokia 2.3.

Name UMIDIGI A9 Nokia 2.3
UMIDIGI A9 Nokia 2.3
Antutu benchmark 101288 69311
CPU MediaTek Helio G25 MediaTek Helio A22
Diagonal size 6.53 " 6.2 "
Resolution 1600x720 1520x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 3 Gb 2 Gb
Bezel-less Yes No
ROM 64 GB 32 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera 13 Mp 13 Mp
Camera Triple Camera Dual Camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 5150 mAh 4000 mAh
Wireless charging No No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC No No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led No No
Fingerprint's scanner Yes No
Operating system (OS) Android 11 Android 10.0 (Q)
Material Plastic Plastic
Weight 204 g 183 g
Dimensions 164 x 77.14 x 9.45 mm 157.7 x 75.4 x 8.7 mm
  Price Discontinued. View all UMIDIGI models here
Alternatives to the UMIDIGI A9:
UMIDIGI Power 7S - Compare
UMIDIGI C1 - Compare
UMIDIGI Bison X10S - Compare
113.24€ ($129.99) See Details

UMIDIGI A9 vs Nokia 2.3: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the UMIDIGI A9’s camera vs Nokia 2.3’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name UMIDIGI A9 Nokia 2.3
Rear camera 13 Mp 13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash Dual LED flash Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No No

UMIDIGI A9 vs Nokia 2.3: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the UMIDIGI A9 vs Nokia 2.3, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name UMIDIGI A9 Nokia 2.3
Battery 5150 mAh 4000 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 6-7 days
Battery Life 2-3 days 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 10-12 hours 8-9 hours
Talk time 30 hours 25 hours
Fast charging Yes No
Wireless charging No No

UMIDIGI A9 vs Nokia 2.3: Antutu benchmark comparison. UMIDIGI A9 vs Nokia 2.3: Antutu benchmark comparison.

UMIDIGI A9 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 101288 score points which is 46.14% faster than the Nokia 2.3, which got 69311. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

UMIDIGI A9
6.53 inches (1600x720) Curved Glass / Helio G25 / 3Gb / 64GB / 13Mp / 5150mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
Nokia 2.3
6.2 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Helio A22 / 2Gb / 32GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh
113.24€
$129.99
 

UMIDIGI A9 vs Nokia 2.3: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

UMIDIGI A9 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 134 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia 2.3 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 483 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

UMIDIGI A9
6.53 inches (1600x720) Curved Glass / Helio G25 / 3Gb / 64GB / 13Mp / 5150mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
Nokia 2.3
6.2 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Helio A22 / 2Gb / 32GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh
113.24€
$129.99
 

What is the difference between UMIDIGI A9 and Nokia 2.3? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the UMIDIGI A9 (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 46.14% faster in the Antutu test (31977 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 1600x720 vs 1520x720.
  • More battery capacity: 5150mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 1150mAh).
  • Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take UMIDIGI A9 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 2.3 (advantages)

  • Best weight: 21 grams less (183 vs 204).

Why it is better not to take Nokia 2.3 (disadvantages)

  • Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

UMIDIGI A9 related comparisons

Nokia 2.3 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.67/5 of 3
Frequent comparisons