Compare Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb
Name | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 517699 | 85188 |
CPU | Samsung Exynos 990 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 |
Diagonal size | 6.9 " | 5.71 " |
Resolution | 3120x1440 | 1520x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
RAM | 8 Gb | 2 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | No |
ROM | 256 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
Rear camera | 108 Mp | 13 Mp |
Camera | Four cameras | Dual Camera |
Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 8 Mp |
Battery | 4500 mAh | 3000 mAh |
Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Network | 4 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | Yes |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | No | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic frame and glass case |
Weight | 209 g | 161 g |
Dimensions | 164,8 x 77.2 x 8,1 mm | 149×71.3×8.4 mm |
Price | 906.10€ ($948.60) See Details | 87.72€ ($91.84) See Details |
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra’s camera vs Nokia 4.2’s camera, see the difference between the 108Mp Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 108 Mp | 13 Mp |
Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX | |
Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 8 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs Nokia 4.2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Battery | 4500 mAh | 3000 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 6-7 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 517699 score points which is 507.71% faster than the Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb, which got 85188. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 912 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb which got 175, it is 421.14% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3122 vs 798 (291.23% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 507.71% faster in the Antutu test (432511 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 10Mp vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 3120x1440 vs 1520x720.
- More battery capacity: 4500mAh vs 3000mAh (a difference of 1500mAh).
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 48 grams less (161 vs 209).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- Compare Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
- Compare Xiaomi 11T Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- Compare Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Nokia 4.2 vs Samsung Galaxy A01
- Compare MiGueR Note 10 vs Nokia 4.2
- Compare Nokia 4.2 vs LG Q6
- Compare Nokia 4.2 vs Oppo A15
- Compare Nokia C30 vs Nokia 4.2