Compare Vivo X50e vs OUKITEL C11 Pro
| Name | Vivo X50e | OUKITEL C11 Pro |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 328277 | 40024 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | MediaTek MT6739 |
| Diagonal size | 6.44 " | 5.45 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1440x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 4350 mAh | 3400 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 8.1 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal frame and plastic case |
| Weight | 200 g | 176 g |
| Dimensions | 162.05 × 74.97 × 8.8 mm | 146,6 x 70 x 10,3 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo X50e: Vivo IQOO 11 Pro 8/256GB - Compare Vivo IQOO Neo 7 SE 8/128GB - Compare Vivo IQOO 9 8/256GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C11 Pro: OUKITEL C25 - Compare OUKITEL WP30 Pro - Compare OUKITEL WP27 - Compare |
Vivo X50e vs OUKITEL C11 Pro: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo X50e’s camera vs OUKITEL C11 Pro’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX586 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vivo X50e | OUKITEL C11 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Vivo X50e vs OUKITEL C11 Pro: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo X50e vs OUKITEL C11 Pro, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vivo X50e | OUKITEL C11 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4350 mAh | 3400 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 20 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Vivo X50e vs OUKITEL C11 Pro: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo X50e in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 328277 score points which is 720.20% faster than the OUKITEL C11 Pro, which got 40024. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo X50e vs OUKITEL C11 Pro: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo X50e in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 675 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C11 Pro which got 150, it is 350.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1958 vs 370 (429.19% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo X50e and OUKITEL C11 Pro? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo X50e (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 720.20% faster in the Antutu test (288253 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX586 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1440x720.
- More battery capacity: 4350mAh vs 3400mAh (a difference of 950mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Vivo X50e (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C11 Pro (advantages)
- Best weight: 24 grams less (176 vs 200).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C11 Pro (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Vivo X50e related comparisons
- Compare Oppo Reno 5 vs Vivo X50e
- Compare Vivo X50e vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
- Compare Vivo X50e vs Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
- Compare Oppo Realme X3 vs Vivo X50e
- Compare Vivo X50e vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
OUKITEL C11 Pro related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 6A vs OUKITEL C11 Pro
- Compare Vernee T3 Pro vs OUKITEL C11 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL C8 vs OUKITEL C11 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL C11 Pro vs Doogee Y8
- Compare Meizu M8C vs OUKITEL C11 Pro