Compare Vivo IQOO 9 8/256GB vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb
| Name | Vivo IQOO 9 8/256GB | OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 1048337 | 22176 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | MediaTek MT6580 |
| Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 6.18 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 996x480 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GN5 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 3300 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 3 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 12 | Android 8.1 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | 206 g | 182 g |
| Dimensions | 164.55 x 76.7 x 8.37 mm | 155,7 x 76 x 9,7 mm |
| Price | 667.22€ ($711.42) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: OUKITEL K3 Pro - Compare OUKITEL WP12 - Compare OUKITEL C32 - Compare |
Vivo IQOO 9 8/256GB vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo IQOO 9’s camera vs OUKITEL C12’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Samsung GN5 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vivo IQOO 9 8/256GB | OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GN5 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Vivo IQOO 9 8/256GB vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo IQOO 9 vs OUKITEL C12, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vivo IQOO 9 8/256GB | OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 3300 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 6-7 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Vivo IQOO 9 8/256GB vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO 9 8/256GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 1048337 score points which is 4627.35% faster than the OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb, which got 22176. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo IQOO 9 8/256GB vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO 9 8/256GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 1211 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb which got 65, it is 1763.08% faster. In "Multi-core" score 4198 vs 222 (1790.99% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo IQOO 9 8/256GB and OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo IQOO 9 8/256GB (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 4627.35% faster in the Antutu test (1026161 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Samsung GN5 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 996x480.
- More battery capacity: 4700mAh vs 3300mAh (a difference of 1400mAh).
Why it is better not to take Vivo IQOO 9 8/256GB (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 24 grams less (182 vs 206).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Vivo IQOO 9 8/256GB related comparisons
- Compare Vivo IQOO 9 vs Vivo IQOO 5
- Compare Vivo IQOO 9 vs Vivo S6
- Compare Vivo IQOO 9 vs Vivo NEX 3S
- Compare Vivo IQOO 9 vs Vivo IQOO Neo 3
- Compare Vivo IQOO 9 vs Vivo X30
OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL C12 Pro vs OUKITEL C12
- Compare OUKITEL C12 vs Doogee Y8
- Compare OUKITEL C11 vs OUKITEL C12
- Compare Leagoo M9 vs OUKITEL C12
- Compare HomTom S16 vs OUKITEL C12