Compare Ulefone Armor 9 vs OUKITEL C16
| Name | Ulefone Armor 9 | OUKITEL C16 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 224199 | 24945 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P90 | MediaTek MT6580 |
| Diagonal size | 6.3 " | 5.71 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1520x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 2600 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 3 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 320 g | 153 g |
| Dimensions | 168.2 x 82 x 15 mm | 146,4 x 70,3 x 9,5 mm |
| Price | 356.58€ ($384.05) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C16: OUKITEL C31 Pro - Compare OUKITEL C19 Pro - Compare OUKITEL WP5 Pro - Compare |
Ulefone Armor 9 vs OUKITEL C16: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Ulefone Armor 9’s camera vs OUKITEL C16’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Samsung GW1 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 9 | OUKITEL C16 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 9 vs OUKITEL C16: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Ulefone Armor 9 vs OUKITEL C16, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 9 | OUKITEL C16 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 2600 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 1,5-2 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Ulefone Armor 9 vs OUKITEL C16: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 9 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 224199 score points which is 798.77% faster than the OUKITEL C16, which got 24945. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Ulefone Armor 9 vs OUKITEL C16: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 9 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 416 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C16 which got 71, it is 485.92% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1534 vs 213 (620.19% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Ulefone Armor 9 and OUKITEL C16? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 9 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 798.77% faster in the Antutu test (199254 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Samsung GW1 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1520x720.
- More battery capacity: 6600mAh vs 2600mAh (a difference of 4000mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 9 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C16 (advantages)
- Best weight: 167 grams less (153 vs 320).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C16 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Ulefone Armor 9 related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9900 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 9
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Armor 9
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7E vs Ulefone Armor 9
- Compare OUKITEL WP7 vs Ulefone Armor 9
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite vs Ulefone Armor 9
OUKITEL C16 related comparisons
- Compare ZTE Blade A530 vs OUKITEL C16
- Compare OUKITEL C16 vs Cubot J9
- Compare Cectdigi P35 vs OUKITEL C16
- Compare OUKITEL K7 vs OUKITEL C16
- Compare OUKITEL K10 vs OUKITEL C16