Compare Asus ROG Phone 3 8/128 Global vs OUKITEL C17

Asus ROG Phone 3 8/128 Global vs OUKITEL C17 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Asus ROG Phone 3 8/128 Global with OUKITEL C17.
Name	Asus ROG Phone 3 8/128 Global	OUKITEL C17

Antutu benchmark	612556	82177
CPU	Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus	MediaTek Helio P23
Diagonal size	6.59 "	6.35 "
Resolution	2340x1080	1560x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	5
RAM	8 Gb	3 Gb
Bezel-less	Yes	Yes
ROM	128 GB	16 GB
External memory	No	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera	64 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Triple Camera	Triple Camera
Sensor model	Sony IMX686
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	20 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	6000 mAh	3900 mAh
Wireless charging	No	No
Network	5 G	4 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	Yes	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	Yes	No
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 10.0 (Q)	Android 9.0
Material	Metal frame and glass case	Plastic
Weight	240 g	193 g
Dimensions	171 x 78 x 9.8 mm	158 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm
Price	Discontinued. View all Asus models here Alternatives to the Asus ROG Phone 3 8/128 Global: Asus ROG Phone 6D 16/256GB - Compare Asus Zenfone Max M2 - Compare Asus ROG Phone 3 12/256GB Snapdragon 865 Plus - Compare	Discontinued. View all OUKITEL models here Alternatives to the OUKITEL C17: OUKITEL C18 Pro - Compare OUKITEL WP7 - Compare OUKITEL WP5000 - Compare

Asus ROG Phone 3 8/128 Global vs OUKITEL C17: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Asus ROG Phone 3 8/128 Global’s camera vs OUKITEL C17’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX686 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Asus ROG Phone 3 8/128 Global	OUKITEL C17
Rear camera	64 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model	Sony IMX686
Flash	Dual LED flash	Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	20 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No	No

Asus ROG Phone 3 8/128 Global vs OUKITEL C17: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Asus ROG Phone 3 8/128 Global vs OUKITEL C17, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Asus ROG Phone 3 8/128 Global	OUKITEL C17
Battery	6000 mAh	3900 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Non-removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days	6-7 days
Battery Life	3-4 days	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	10-12 hours	8-9 hours
Talk time	30 hours	30 hours
Fast charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging	No	No

Asus ROG Phone 3 8/128 Global vs OUKITEL C17: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Asus ROG Phone 3 8/128 Global in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 612556 score points which is 645.41% faster than the OUKITEL C17, which got 82177. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Asus ROG Phone 3 8/128 Global

6.59 inches (2340x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 865 Plus / 8Gb / 128GB / 64Mp Sony IMX686 / 6000mAh

0.00€

$0.00

612556

OUKITEL C17

6.35 inches (1560x720) Glass / Helio P23 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 3900mAh

0.00€

$0.00

82177

Asus ROG Phone 3 8/128 Global vs OUKITEL C17: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Asus ROG Phone 3 8/128 Global in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 927 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C17 which got 156, it is 494.23% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3348 vs 875 (282.63% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Asus ROG Phone 3 8/128 Global

6.59 inches (2340x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 865 Plus / 8Gb / 128GB / 64Mp Sony IMX686 / 6000mAh

0.00€

$0.00

927 / 3348

OUKITEL C17

6.35 inches (1560x720) Glass / Helio P23 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 3900mAh

0.00€

$0.00

156 / 875

What is the difference between Asus ROG Phone 3 8/128 Global and OUKITEL C17? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Asus ROG Phone 3 8/128 Global (advantages)

Good performance: Is 645.41% faster in the Antutu test (530379 score difference).
Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX686 compared to 13Mp
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 5Mp .
NFC supports.
Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1560x720.
More battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 3900mAh (a difference of 2100mAh).
Have fast charging supports.
Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take Asus ROG Phone 3 8/128 Global (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C17 (advantages)

Best weight: 47 grams less (193 vs 240).

Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C17 (disadvantages)

Does not support NFC.
Does not have fast charging support
Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The advantages of both models

Asus ROG Phone 3 8/128 Global related comparisons

OUKITEL C17 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons