Compare OUKITEL C17 vs Nokia 2.3

OUKITEL C17 vs Nokia 2.3 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of OUKITEL C17 with Nokia 2.3.
Name	OUKITEL C17	Nokia 2.3

Antutu benchmark	82177	69311
CPU	MediaTek Helio P23	MediaTek Helio A22
Diagonal size	6.35 "	6.2 "
Resolution	1560x720	1520x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	5	5
RAM	3 Gb	2 Gb
Bezel-less	Yes	No
ROM	16 GB	32 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera	13 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Triple Camera	Dual Camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	3900 mAh	4000 mAh
Wireless charging	No	No
Network	4 G	4 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	No	No
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 9.0	Android 10.0 (Q)
Material	Plastic	Plastic
Weight	193 g	183 g
Dimensions	158 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm	157.7 x 75.4 x 8.7 mm
Price	Discontinued. View all OUKITEL models here Alternatives to the OUKITEL C17: OUKITEL C32 - Compare OUKITEL C33 - Compare OUKITEL WP7 - Compare	112.55€ ($129.99) See Details

OUKITEL C17 vs Nokia 2.3: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the OUKITEL C17’s camera vs Nokia 2.3’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	OUKITEL C17	Nokia 2.3
Rear camera	13 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	Dual LED flash	Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No	No

OUKITEL C17 vs Nokia 2.3: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the OUKITEL C17 vs Nokia 2.3, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	OUKITEL C17	Nokia 2.3
Battery	3900 mAh	4000 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Non-removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days	6-7 days
Battery Life	2-3 days	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	8-9 hours	8-9 hours
Talk time	30 hours	25 hours
Fast charging	No	No
Wireless charging	No	No

OUKITEL C17 vs Nokia 2.3: Antutu benchmark comparison.

OUKITEL C17 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 82177 score points which is 18.56% faster than the Nokia 2.3, which got 69311. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

OUKITEL C17

6.35 inches (1560x720) Glass / Helio P23 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 3900mAh

0.00€

$0.00

82177

Nokia 2.3

6.2 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Helio A22 / 2Gb / 32GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh

112.55€

$129.99

69311

OUKITEL C17 vs Nokia 2.3: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

OUKITEL C17 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 156 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia 2.3 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 875 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

OUKITEL C17

6.35 inches (1560x720) Glass / Helio P23 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 3900mAh

0.00€

$0.00

156 / 875

Nokia 2.3

6.2 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Helio A22 / 2Gb / 32GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh

112.55€

$129.99

0 / 0

What is the difference between OUKITEL C17 and Nokia 2.3? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C17 (advantages)

Good performance: Is 18.56% faster in the Antutu test (12866 score difference).
Has a higher screen resolution: 1560x720 vs 1520x720.

Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C17 (disadvantages)

Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 2.3 (advantages)

Best weight: 10 grams less (183 vs 193).
More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 3900mAh (a difference of 100mAh).
Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take Nokia 2.3 (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

OUKITEL C17 related comparisons

Nokia 2.3 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.29/5 of 14

Frequent comparisons