Compare Ulefone Armor 9E vs OUKITEL C17
| Name | Ulefone Armor 9E | OUKITEL C17 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 223811 | 82177 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P90 | MediaTek Helio P23 |
| Diagonal size | 6.3 " | 6.35 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1560x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 3900 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 320 g | 193 g |
| Dimensions | 168.2 x 82 x 15 mm | 158 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm |
| Price | 317.98€ ($366.46) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C17: OUKITEL WP200 Pro - Compare OUKITEL C31 3/16GB - Compare OUKITEL C35 - Compare |
Ulefone Armor 9E vs OUKITEL C17: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Ulefone Armor 9E’s camera vs OUKITEL C17’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Samsung GW1 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 9E | OUKITEL C17 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 9E vs OUKITEL C17: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Ulefone Armor 9E vs OUKITEL C17, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 9E | OUKITEL C17 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 3900 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Ulefone Armor 9E vs OUKITEL C17: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 9E in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 223811 score points which is 172.35% faster than the OUKITEL C17, which got 82177. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Ulefone Armor 9E vs OUKITEL C17: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 9E in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 417 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C17 which got 156, it is 167.31% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1531 vs 875 (74.97% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Ulefone Armor 9E and OUKITEL C17? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 9E (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 172.35% faster in the Antutu test (141634 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Samsung GW1 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1560x720.
- More battery capacity: 6600mAh vs 3900mAh (a difference of 2700mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 9E (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C17 (advantages)
- Best weight: 127 grams less (193 vs 320).
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C17 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Ulefone Armor 9E related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9800 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Blackview BV9800 vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Ulefone Armor 9 vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6S vs Ulefone Armor 9E
OUKITEL C17 related comparisons
- Compare UMIDIGI A5 Pro vs OUKITEL C17
- Compare OUKITEL C17 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Global
- Compare Ulefone Power 3s vs OUKITEL C17
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 8A vs OUKITEL C17
- Compare OUKITEL C17 Pro vs OUKITEL C17