0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR درهم SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Google Pixel 3a vs OUKITEL K9

Google Pixel 3a vs OUKITEL K9 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Google Pixel 3a with OUKITEL K9.

Name Google Pixel 3a OUKITEL K9
Google Pixel 3a OUKITEL K9
Antutu benchmark 176653 82987
CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 MediaTek Helio P35
Diagonal size 5.6 " 7.12 "
Resolution 2220x1080 2244x1080
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 10
RAM 4 Gb 4 Gb
Bezel-less No Yes
ROM 64 GB 64 GB
External memory No MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera 12 Mp 16 Mp
Camera Single camera Dual Camera
Sensor model Sony IMX363 Sony IMX298
dxomark mobile ranking 101
dxomark (photo) 104
dxomark (video) 95
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 8 Mp
Battery 3000 mAh 6000 mAh
Wireless charging No No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led No Yes
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 11 Android 9.0
Material Plastic Metal frame and plastic case
Weight 147 g g
Dimensions 151.3 x 70,1 x 8,2 mm mm
  Price 185.68€ ($199.00) See Details 145.55€ ($155.99) See Details

Google Pixel 3a vs OUKITEL K9: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Google Pixel 3a’s camera vs OUKITEL K9’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp Sony IMX363 sensor and the 16Mp Sony IMX298 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Google Pixel 3a OUKITEL K9
Rear camera 12 Mp 16 Mp
Sensor model Sony IMX363 Sony IMX298
Flash Dual LED flash Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 8 Mp
Flash No No

Google Pixel 3a vs OUKITEL K9: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Google Pixel 3a vs OUKITEL K9, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Google Pixel 3a OUKITEL K9
Battery 3000 mAh 6000 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 5-6 days 6-7 days
Battery Life 1,5-2 days 3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode 6-7 hours 10-12 hours
Talk time 25 hours 30 hours
Fast charging Yes Yes
Wireless charging No No

Google Pixel 3a vs OUKITEL K9: Antutu benchmark comparison. Google Pixel 3a vs OUKITEL K9: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Google Pixel 3a in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 176653 score points which is 112.87% faster than the OUKITEL K9, which got 82987. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Google Pixel 3a
5.6" (2220x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 670 / 4Gb / 64GB / 12Mp Sony IMX363 / 3000mAh
185.68€
$199.00
 
OUKITEL K9
7.12 inches (2244x1080) Curved Glass / Helio P35 / 4Gb / 64GB / 16Mp Sony IMX298 / 6000mAh
145.55€
$155.99
 

Google Pixel 3a vs OUKITEL K9: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Google Pixel 3a in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 342 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL K9 which got 175, it is 95.43% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1211 vs 642 (88.63% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Google Pixel 3a
5.6" (2220x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 670 / 4Gb / 64GB / 12Mp Sony IMX363 / 3000mAh
185.68€
$199.00
 
OUKITEL K9
7.12 inches (2244x1080) Curved Glass / Helio P35 / 4Gb / 64GB / 16Mp Sony IMX298 / 6000mAh
145.55€
$155.99
 

What is the difference between Google Pixel 3a and OUKITEL K9? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Google Pixel 3a (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 112.87% faster in the Antutu test (93666 score difference).
  • NFC supports.
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take Google Pixel 3a (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL K9 (advantages)

  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp Sony IMX298 compared to 12Mp Sony IMX363
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2244x1080 vs 2220x1080.
  • More battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 3000mAh (a difference of 3000mAh).

Why it is better not to take OUKITEL K9 (disadvantages)

  • Does not support NFC.
  • Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The advantages of both models

  • Have fast charging supports.

Google Pixel 3a related comparisons

OUKITEL K9 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.50/5 of 2
Frequent comparisons