Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 3S vs OUKITEL Y4800
| Name | Xiaomi Black Shark 3S | OUKITEL Y4800 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 657199 | 149833 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | MediaTek Helio P70 |
| Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 6.3 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2340x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | Sony IMX582 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Battery | 4720 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal | Metal frame and plastic case |
| Weight | 222 g | 170 g |
| Dimensions | 168.7 x 77.3 x 10.4 mm | 157 x 74.8 x 8.25 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Black Shark 3S: Xiaomi Redmi A1 - Compare Xiaomi Civi 8/256Gb - Compare Xiaomi Poco X4 GT 8/128GB - Compare |
195.74€ ($211.20) See Details |
Xiaomi Black Shark 3S vs OUKITEL Y4800: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Black Shark 3S’s camera vs OUKITEL Y4800’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Samsung GW1 sensor and the 48Mp Sony IMX582 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi Black Shark 3S | OUKITEL Y4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | Sony IMX582 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Black Shark 3S vs OUKITEL Y4800: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Black Shark 3S vs OUKITEL Y4800, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi Black Shark 3S | OUKITEL Y4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4720 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Xiaomi Black Shark 3S vs OUKITEL Y4800: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3S in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 657199 score points which is 338.62% faster than the OUKITEL Y4800, which got 149833. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3S vs OUKITEL Y4800: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3S in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 904 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL Y4800 which got 310, it is 191.61% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3315 vs 1399 (136.95% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Black Shark 3S and OUKITEL Y4800? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Black Shark 3S (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 338.62% faster in the Antutu test (507366 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Samsung GW1 compared to 48Mp Sony IMX582
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp Samsung S5K3T2 vs 16Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 2340x1080.
- More battery capacity: 4720mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 720mAh).
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Black Shark 3S (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL Y4800 (advantages)
- Best weight: 52 grams less (170 vs 222).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL Y4800 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3S related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro vs Xiaomi Black Shark 3S
- Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 3 vs Xiaomi Black Shark 3S
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi K30 Pro vs Xiaomi Black Shark 3S
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 9s vs Xiaomi Black Shark 3S
- Compare OnePlus 8 vs Xiaomi Black Shark 3S
OUKITEL Y4800 related comparisons
- Compare Elephone Soldier vs OUKITEL Y4800
- Compare OUKITEL Y4800 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Global
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs OUKITEL Y4800
- Compare OUKITEL U23 vs OUKITEL Y4800
- Compare OUKITEL Y4800 vs Doogee N20