Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Vivo U20
| Name | Samsung Galaxy M51 | Vivo U20 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 267699 | 189355 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 |
| Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 6.53 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2340x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | Sony IMX499 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Weight | 213 g | 193 g |
| Dimensions | 163,9 x 76,3 x 9,5 mm | 162,2 x 76.5 x 8.9 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy M51: Samsung Galaxy A34 5G 6/256GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy A8S - Compare Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra 12/1024GB - Compare |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo U20: Vivo IQOO 7 12/256GB - Compare Vivo S16 - Compare Vivo IQOO 9 Pro 12/256GB - Compare |
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Vivo U20: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy M51’s camera vs Vivo U20’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX682 sensor and the 16Mp Sony IMX499 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy M51 | Vivo U20 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | Sony IMX499 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Vivo U20: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Vivo U20, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy M51 | Vivo U20 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Vivo U20: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy M51 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 267699 score points which is 41.37% faster than the Vivo U20, which got 189355. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Vivo U20: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy M51 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 382 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vivo U20 which got 504, it is -24.21% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1518 vs 1611 (-5.77% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy M51 and Vivo U20? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy M51 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 41.37% faster in the Antutu test (78344 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX682 compared to 16Mp Sony IMX499
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Sony IMX616 vs 16Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 2340x1080.
- More battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 2000mAh).
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy M51 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo U20 (advantages)
- Best weight: 20 grams less (193 vs 213).
Why it is better not to take Vivo U20 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Samsung Galaxy M51 related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M51
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M62 vs Samsung Galaxy M51
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Samsung Galaxy A72
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Samsung Galaxy M31S
Vivo U20 related comparisons
- Compare Realme Q2i vs Vivo U20
- Compare Oppo A15 vs Vivo U20
- Compare LG K20 vs Vivo U20
- Compare Vivo S5 vs Vivo U20
- Compare OUKITEL WP6 vs Vivo U20