Compare Samsung Galaxy Note 9 vs IIIF150 R2022

Samsung Galaxy Note 9 vs IIIF150 R2022 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Samsung Galaxy Note 9 with IIIF150 R2022.
Name	Samsung Galaxy Note 9	IIIF150 R2022

Antutu benchmark	401884	313177
CPU	Samsung Exynos 9810	MediaTek Helio G95
Diagonal size	6.4 "	6.78 "
Resolution	2960x1440	2460x1080
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	10
RAM	6 Gb	8 Gb
Bezel-less	Yes	No
ROM	64 GB	128 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera	12 Mp	64 Mp
Camera	Dual Camera	Four cameras
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking	103
dxomark (photo)	107
dxomark (video)	94
Front (selfie) camera	8 Mp	16 Mp
Battery	4000 mAh	8300 mAh
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Network	4 G	4 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	Yes	Yes
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	Yes	No
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 9.0	Android 11
Material	Metal frame and glass case	Plastics and rubber
Weight	201 g	350 g
Dimensions	161,9 x 71,8 x 7,9 mm	175.7 x 84 x 15.5 mm
Price	Discontinued. View all Samsung models here Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy Note 9: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 8/512GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 Plus - Compare Samsung Galaxy A54 5G 8/128GB - Compare	175.94€ ($203.20) See Details

Samsung Galaxy Note 9 vs IIIF150 R2022: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy Note 9’s camera vs IIIF150 R2022’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp sensor and the 64Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Samsung Galaxy Note 9	IIIF150 R2022
Rear camera	12 Mp	64 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	Dual LED flash	Four LEDs
Front (selfie) camera	8 Mp	16 Mp
Flash	No	No

Samsung Galaxy Note 9 vs IIIF150 R2022: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy Note 9 vs IIIF150 R2022, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Samsung Galaxy Note 9	IIIF150 R2022
Battery	4000 mAh	8300 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Non-removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days	6-7 days
Battery Life	3-4 days	3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode	8-9 hours	14-15 hours
Talk time	30 hours	30 hours
Fast charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging	Yes	No

Samsung Galaxy Note 9 vs IIIF150 R2022: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Samsung Galaxy Note 9 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 401884 score points which is 28.32% faster than the IIIF150 R2022, which got 313177. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Samsung Galaxy Note 9

6.4 inches (2960x1440) Curved Glass / Exynos 9810 / 6Gb / 64GB / 12Mp / 4000mAh

0.00€

$0.00

401884

IIIF150 R2022

6.78 inches (2460x1080) Curved Glass / Helio G95 / 8Gb / 128GB / 64Mp / 8300mAh

175.94€

$203.20

313177

Samsung Galaxy Note 9 vs IIIF150 R2022: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Samsung Galaxy Note 9 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 681 points score in "Single-core" of against the IIIF150 R2022 which got 427, it is 59.48% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2019 vs 1550 (30.26% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Samsung Galaxy Note 9

6.4 inches (2960x1440) Curved Glass / Exynos 9810 / 6Gb / 64GB / 12Mp / 4000mAh

0.00€

$0.00

681 / 2019

IIIF150 R2022

6.78 inches (2460x1080) Curved Glass / Helio G95 / 8Gb / 128GB / 64Mp / 8300mAh

175.94€

$203.20

427 / 1550

What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy Note 9 and IIIF150 R2022? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (advantages)

Good performance: Is 28.32% faster in the Antutu test (88707 score difference).
Best weight: 149 grams less (201 vs 350).
Has a higher screen resolution: 2960x1440 vs 2460x1080.
Have wireless charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 R2022 (advantages)

Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp compared to 12Mp
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 8Mp .
More battery capacity: 8300mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 4300mAh).

Why it is better not to take IIIF150 R2022 (disadvantages)

Does not have wireless charging support.

The advantages of both models

NFC supports.
Have water resistant supports.
Have fast charging supports.
Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Samsung Galaxy Note 9 related comparisons

IIIF150 R2022 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons