Compare Google Pixel 3 XL 4/64GB vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
| Name | Google Pixel 3 XL 4/64GB | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 332155 | 276448 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 |
| Diagonal size | 6.3 " | 5.2 " |
| Resolution | 2992x1440 | 2280x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | No | No |
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX363 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 3430 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | 184 g | 139 g |
| Dimensions | 158 x 76,7 x 7,9 mm | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm |
| Price | 189.81€ ($219.99) See Details | 350.05€ ($405.71) See Details |
Google Pixel 3 XL 4/64GB vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Google Pixel 3 XL’s camera vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp Sony IMX363 sensor and the 22.6Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Google Pixel 3 XL 4/64GB | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX363 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Google Pixel 3 XL 4/64GB vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Google Pixel 3 XL vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Google Pixel 3 XL 4/64GB | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 3430 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 1,5-2 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 7-8 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
Google Pixel 3 XL 4/64GB vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Google Pixel 3 XL 4/64GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 332155 score points which is 20.15% faster than the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, which got 276448. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Google Pixel 3 XL 4/64GB vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Google Pixel 3 XL 4/64GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 496 points score in "Single-core" of against the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact which got 501, it is -1.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1658 vs 1986 (-16.52% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Google Pixel 3 XL 4/64GB and Sharp Aquos R2 Compact? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Google Pixel 3 XL 4/64GB (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 20.15% faster in the Antutu test (55707 score difference).
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2992x1440 vs 2280x1080.
- More battery capacity: 3430mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 930mAh).
Why it is better not to take Google Pixel 3 XL 4/64GB (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Best weight: 45 grams less (139 vs 184).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 22.6Mp compared to 12Mp Sony IMX363
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Google Pixel 3 XL 4/64GB related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro vs Google Pixel 3 XL
- Compare Google Pixel 3 XL vs Google Pixel 5a
- Compare Google Pixel 6 Pro vs Google Pixel 3 XL
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T vs Google Pixel 3 XL
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 8 vs Google Pixel 3 XL
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact