Compare Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C18 Pro
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | OUKITEL C18 Pro |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 276448 | 92966 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | MediaTek MT6757 Pro / Helio P25 |
| Diagonal size | 5.2 " | 6.55 " |
| Resolution | 2280x1080 | 1600x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Four cameras |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Metal | Plastic |
| Weight | 139 g | 200 g |
| Dimensions | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm | 163.3 x 75.3 x 8.3 mm |
| Price | 345.95€ ($369.04) See Details | 92.23€ ($98.39) See Details |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C18 Pro: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera vs OUKITEL C18 Pro’s camera, see the difference between the 22.6Mp sensor and the 16Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | OUKITEL C18 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C18 Pro: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C18 Pro, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | OUKITEL C18 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C18 Pro: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 276448 score points which is 197.36% faster than the OUKITEL C18 Pro, which got 92966. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C18 Pro: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 501 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C18 Pro which got 177, it is 183.05% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1986 vs 891 (122.90% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Sharp Aquos R2 Compact and OUKITEL C18 Pro? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 197.36% faster in the Antutu test (183482 score difference).
- Best weight: 61 grams less (139 vs 200).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 22.6Mp compared to 16Mp
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2280x1080 vs 1600x720.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C18 Pro (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 1500mAh).
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C18 Pro (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
OUKITEL C18 Pro related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL C17 Pro vs OUKITEL C18 Pro
- Compare Ulefone Armor X5 vs OUKITEL C18 Pro
- Compare Lenovo K5 Pro vs OUKITEL C18 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL Mix 2 vs OUKITEL C18 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL C15 Pro vs OUKITEL C18 Pro