Compare Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
| Name | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 517699 | 276448 |
| CPU | Samsung Exynos 990 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 |
| Diagonal size | 6.9 " | 5.2 " |
| Resolution | 3120x1440 | 2280x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | No | No |
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | 209 g | 139 g |
| Dimensions | 164,8 x 77.2 x 8,1 mm | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm |
| Price | 892.93€ ($1034.91) See Details | 350.05€ ($405.71) See Details |
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra’s camera vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera, see the difference between the 108Mp Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX sensor and the 22.6Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 517699 score points which is 87.27% faster than the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, which got 276448. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 912 points score in "Single-core" of against the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact which got 501, it is 82.04% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3122 vs 1986 (57.20% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and Sharp Aquos R2 Compact? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 87.27% faster in the Antutu test (241251 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX compared to 22.6Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 10Mp vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 3120x1440 vs 2280x1080.
- More battery capacity: 4500mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 2000mAh).
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Best weight: 70 grams less (139 vs 209).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- Compare Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
- Compare Xiaomi 11T Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- Compare Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact