Compare Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Vivo U20
Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Vivo U20 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 276448 | 189355 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 |
Diagonal size | 5.2 " | 6.53 " |
Resolution | 2280x1080 | 2340x1080 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
RAM | 4 Gb | 4 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
ROM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 16 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Triple Camera |
Sensor model | Sony IMX499 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 16 Mp |
Battery | 2500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Network | 4 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | Yes | No |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 9.0 |
Material | Metal | Plastic |
Weight | 139 g | 193 g |
Dimensions | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm | 162,2 x 76.5 x 8.9 mm |
Price | 342.98€ ($372.44) See Details |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo U20: Vivo IQOO 11 Pro 16/512GB - Compare Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 5G 8/256GB - Compare Vivo IQOO 10 12/512GB - Compare |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Vivo U20: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera vs Vivo U20’s camera, see the difference between the 22.6Mp sensor and the 16Mp Sony IMX499 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Vivo U20 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 16 Mp |
Sensor model | Sony IMX499 | |
Flash | LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 16 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Vivo U20: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Vivo U20, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Vivo U20 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 2500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | 10-12 hours |
Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Vivo U20: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 276448 score points which is 45.99% faster than the Vivo U20, which got 189355. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Vivo U20: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 501 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vivo U20 which got 504, it is -0.60% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1986 vs 1611 (23.28% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Sharp Aquos R2 Compact and Vivo U20? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 45.99% faster in the Antutu test (87093 score difference).
- Best weight: 54 grams less (139 vs 193).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 22.6Mp compared to 16Mp Sony IMX499
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo U20 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 2280x1080.
- More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 2500mAh).
Why it is better not to take Vivo U20 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
Vivo U20 related comparisons
- Compare Realme Q2i vs Vivo U20
- Compare Oppo A15 vs Vivo U20
- Compare LG K20 vs Vivo U20
- Compare Vivo S5 vs Vivo U20
- Compare OUKITEL WP6 vs Vivo U20