Compare Xiaomi Mi 6 Classic Edition vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
| Name | Xiaomi Mi 6 Classic Edition | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 362990 | 276448 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 |
| Diagonal size | 5.9 " | 5.2 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2280x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | No | No |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 3500 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | g | 139 g |
| Dimensions | mm | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Mi 6 Classic Edition: Xiaomi Poco F4 GT 12/256GB - Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 8/128Gb - Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 4S 12/256GB - Compare |
350.05€ ($405.71) See Details |
Xiaomi Mi 6 Classic Edition vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Mi 6 Classic Edition’s camera vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX686 sensor and the 22.6Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi Mi 6 Classic Edition | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Mi 6 Classic Edition vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Mi 6 Classic Edition vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi Mi 6 Classic Edition | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 3500 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 7-8 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
Xiaomi Mi 6 Classic Edition vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Mi 6 Classic Edition in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 362990 score points which is 31.30% faster than the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, which got 276448. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Mi 6 Classic Edition vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Mi 6 Classic Edition in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 646 points score in "Single-core" of against the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact which got 501, it is 28.94% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2529 vs 1986 (27.34% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Mi 6 Classic Edition and Sharp Aquos R2 Compact? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Mi 6 Classic Edition (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 31.30% faster in the Antutu test (86542 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX686 compared to 22.6Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 2280x1080.
- More battery capacity: 3500mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 1000mAh).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Mi 6 Classic Edition (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Xiaomi Mi 6 Classic Edition related comparisons
- Compare OnePlus 7 vs Xiaomi Mi 6 Classic Edition
- Compare OnePlus 6T vs Xiaomi Mi 6 Classic Edition
- Compare Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 vs Xiaomi Mi 6 Classic Edition
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 9A vs Xiaomi Mi 6 Classic Edition
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 6 Classic Edition
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact