Compare Xiaomi Poco F3 6/128GB vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
| Name | Xiaomi Poco F3 6/128GB | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 683277 | 276448 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 |
| Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 5.2 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2280x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | No | No |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX582 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 4520 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastic frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | 201 g | 139 g |
| Dimensions | 163,7 x 76,4 x 7,8 mm | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm |
| Price | 225.38€ ($260.30) See Details | 349.68€ ($403.86) See Details |
Xiaomi Poco F3 6/128GB vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Poco F3’s camera vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX582 sensor and the 22.6Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi Poco F3 6/128GB | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX582 | |
| Flash | LED flash | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Poco F3 6/128GB vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Poco F3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi Poco F3 6/128GB | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4520 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
Xiaomi Poco F3 6/128GB vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Poco F3 6/128GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 683277 score points which is 147.16% faster than the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, which got 276448. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Poco F3 6/128GB vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Poco F3 6/128GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 926 points score in "Single-core" of against the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact which got 501, it is 84.83% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3266 vs 1986 (64.45% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Poco F3 6/128GB and Sharp Aquos R2 Compact? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Poco F3 6/128GB (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 147.16% faster in the Antutu test (406829 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX582 compared to 22.6Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 2280x1080.
- More battery capacity: 4520mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 2020mAh).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Poco F3 6/128GB (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Best weight: 62 grams less (139 vs 201).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Xiaomi Poco F3 6/128GB related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Poco F3 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F3
- Compare Xiaomi Poco F3 vs Xiaomi Poco F3
- Compare Xiaomi Poco F4 vs Xiaomi Poco F3
- Compare Xiaomi Poco F3 vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Apple iPhone XR vs Xiaomi Poco F3
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact