Compare Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs TCL 750
| Name | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | TCL 750 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 37524 | |
| CPU | MediaTek MT6753 | MediaTek MT6755 |
| Diagonal size | 5 " | 5.2 " |
| Resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
| RAM | 3 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 2800 mAh | 2710 mAh |
| Wireless charging | ||
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 6.0 | Android 6.0 |
| Material | Metal and plastic | Metal frame and glass case |
| Weight | 140 g | 138 g |
| Dimensions | 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm | 145,8 x 71,4 x 7,0 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all TCL models here
Alternatives to the TCL 750: |
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs TCL 750: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vernee Thor’s camera vs TCL 750’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 16Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | TCL 750 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | LED flash | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No |
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs TCL 750: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vernee Thor vs TCL 750, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | TCL 750 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 2800 mAh | 2710 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | |
| Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | |
| Talk time | 20 hours | |
| Fast charging | Yes | |
| Wireless charging |
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs TCL 750: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 37524 score points which is 100.00% faster than the TCL 750, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs TCL 750: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 116 points score in "Single-core" of against the TCL 750 which got 155, it is -25.16% faster. In "Multi-core" score 604 vs 672 (-10.12% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vernee Thor 3/16Gb and TCL 750? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 2800mAh vs 2710mAh (a difference of 90mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the TCL 750 (advantages)
- Best weight: 2 grams less (138 vs 140).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1920x1080 vs 1280x720.
Why it is better not to take TCL 750 (disadvantages)
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Vernee Thor vs Doogee X5 Max Pro