Compare Motorola One Hyper vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
| Name | Motorola One Hyper | Ulefone Armor 3WT |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 213177 | 148199 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 | MediaTek Helio P70 |
| Diagonal size | 6.5 " | 5.7 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 2160x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 21 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | Sony IMX230 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 10300 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastic | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 200 g | 364 g |
| Dimensions | 161,8 x 76,6 x 8,9 mm | 164,8 x 79,2 x 18,2 mm |
| Price | 249.81€ ($255.99) See Details | 280.75€ ($287.69) See Details |
Motorola One Hyper vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Motorola One Hyper’s camera vs Ulefone Armor 3WT’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Samsung GW1 sensor and the 21Mp Sony IMX230 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Motorola One Hyper | Ulefone Armor 3WT |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 21 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | Sony IMX230 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | Double LED | No |
Motorola One Hyper vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Motorola One Hyper vs Ulefone Armor 3WT, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Motorola One Hyper | Ulefone Armor 3WT |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 10300 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 8-9 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 5-6 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Motorola One Hyper vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Motorola One Hyper in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 213177 score points which is 43.85% faster than the Ulefone Armor 3WT, which got 148199. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Motorola One Hyper vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Motorola One Hyper in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 496 points score in "Single-core" of against the Ulefone Armor 3WT which got 320, it is 55.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1475 vs 1475 (0.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Motorola One Hyper and Ulefone Armor 3WT? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Motorola One Hyper (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 43.85% faster in the Antutu test (64978 score difference).
- Best weight: 164 grams less (200 vs 364).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Samsung GW1 compared to 21Mp Sony IMX230
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 2160x1080.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Motorola One Hyper (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 3WT (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 10300mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 5300mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 3WT (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Motorola One Hyper related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro vs Motorola One Hyper
- Compare Motorola One Hyper vs Xiaomi mi3
- Compare Motorola One Hyper vs Motorola Moto G20
- Compare Jiayu G5S vs Motorola One Hyper
- Compare Motorola One Hyper vs Motorola Moto G22
Ulefone Armor 3WT related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9800 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Plus vs Ulefone Armor 3WT