Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
| Name | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 | Ulefone Armor 3WT |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 647884 | 148199 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus | MediaTek Helio P70 |
| Diagonal size | 7.6 " | 5.7 " |
| Resolution | 2208x1768 | 2160x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 21 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5K2LD | Sony IMX230 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 4365 mAh | 10300 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 279 g | 364 g |
| Dimensions | 159,2 x 68 x 16,8 mm | 164,8 x 79,2 x 18,2 mm |
| Price | 959.26€ ($999.99) See Details | 275.97€ ($287.69) See Details |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2’s camera vs Ulefone Armor 3WT’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp Samsung S5K2LD sensor and the 21Mp Sony IMX230 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 | Ulefone Armor 3WT |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 21 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5K2LD | Sony IMX230 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 vs Ulefone Armor 3WT, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 | Ulefone Armor 3WT |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4365 mAh | 10300 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 8-9 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 5-6 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 647884 score points which is 337.17% faster than the Ulefone Armor 3WT, which got 148199. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 971 points score in "Single-core" of against the Ulefone Armor 3WT which got 320, it is 203.44% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3331 vs 1475 (125.83% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 and Ulefone Armor 3WT? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 337.17% faster in the Antutu test (499685 score difference).
- Best weight: 85 grams less (279 vs 364).
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 10Mp vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2208x1768 vs 2160x1080.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 3WT (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 21Mp Sony IMX230 compared to 12Mp Samsung S5K2LD
- More battery capacity: 10300mAh vs 4365mAh (a difference of 5935mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 3WT (disadvantages)
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
- Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Oppo X 2021 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2
- Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 vs Samsung Galaxy A82
Ulefone Armor 3WT related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9800 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Plus vs Ulefone Armor 3WT