Compare Motorola Moto G Fast vs Ulefone Armor 3W
| Name | Motorola Moto G Fast | Ulefone Armor 3W |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 158799 | 148199 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | MediaTek Helio P70 |
| Diagonal size | 6.4 " | 5.7 " |
| Resolution | 1560x720 | 2160x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 3 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | 21 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX230 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 10300 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastic | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 189 g | 364 g |
| Dimensions | 161,9 x 75,7 x 9 mm | 164,8 x 79,2 x 18,2 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Motorola models here
Alternatives to the Motorola Moto G Fast: Motorola Moto G73 5G - Compare Motorola Edge 30 Ultra 12/256GB - Compare Motorola One Action - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Ulefone models here
Alternatives to the Ulefone Armor 3W: Ulefone Power Armor 14 - Compare Ulefone Armor X7 - Compare Ulefone Note 12P - Compare |
Motorola Moto G Fast vs Ulefone Armor 3W: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Motorola Moto G Fast’s camera vs Ulefone Armor 3W’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp sensor and the 21Mp Sony IMX230 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Motorola Moto G Fast | Ulefone Armor 3W |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | 21 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX230 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Motorola Moto G Fast vs Ulefone Armor 3W: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Motorola Moto G Fast vs Ulefone Armor 3W, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Motorola Moto G Fast | Ulefone Armor 3W |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 10300 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 8-9 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 5-6 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Motorola Moto G Fast vs Ulefone Armor 3W: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Motorola Moto G Fast in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 158799 score points which is 7.15% faster than the Ulefone Armor 3W, which got 148199. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Motorola Moto G Fast vs Ulefone Armor 3W: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Motorola Moto G Fast in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 313 points score in "Single-core" of against the Ulefone Armor 3W which got 320, it is -2.19% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1368 vs 1475 (-7.25% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Motorola Moto G Fast and Ulefone Armor 3W? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Motorola Moto G Fast (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 7.15% faster in the Antutu test (10600 score difference).
- Best weight: 175 grams less (189 vs 364).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Motorola Moto G Fast (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 3W (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 21Mp Sony IMX230 compared to 16Mp
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2160x1080 vs 1560x720.
- More battery capacity: 10300mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 6300mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 3W (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Motorola Moto G Fast related comparisons
- Compare Motorola Moto G Fast vs Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
- Compare Motorola Moto G Fast vs Samsung Galaxy A02s
- Compare Motorola Moto G Fast vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare UMIDIGI One Max vs Motorola Moto G Fast
- Compare Motorola Moto G Fast vs Huawei Mate 40e
Ulefone Armor 3W related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3W
- Compare Blackview BV9500 vs Ulefone Armor 3W
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs Ulefone Armor 3W
- Compare Ulefone Armor 3W vs UMIDIGI F2
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6 vs Ulefone Armor 3W