Compare Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Ulefone Armor 3W
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Ulefone Armor 3W |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 326155 | 148199 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G | MediaTek Helio P70 |
| Diagonal size | 6.5 " | 5.7 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2160x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 21 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | Sony IMX230 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 10300 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and plastic case | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 187 g | 364 g |
| Dimensions | 159,9 x 75,1 x 8,4 mm | 164,8 x 79,2 x 18,2 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G: Samsung Galaxy A30S 4/64Gb - Compare Samsung Galaxy A60 6/64Gb - Compare Samsung Galaxy A31 4/64GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Ulefone models here
Alternatives to the Ulefone Armor 3W: Ulefone Note 13P - Compare Ulefone Armor X5 - Compare Ulefone Power Armor 13 - Compare |
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Ulefone Armor 3W: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G’s camera vs Ulefone Armor 3W’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX682 sensor and the 21Mp Sony IMX230 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Ulefone Armor 3W |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 21 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | Sony IMX230 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Ulefone Armor 3W: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Ulefone Armor 3W, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Ulefone Armor 3W |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 10300 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 8-9 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 5-6 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Ulefone Armor 3W: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 326155 score points which is 120.08% faster than the Ulefone Armor 3W, which got 148199. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Ulefone Armor 3W: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 613 points score in "Single-core" of against the Ulefone Armor 3W which got 320, it is 91.56% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1916 vs 1475 (29.90% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and Ulefone Armor 3W? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 120.08% faster in the Antutu test (177956 score difference).
- Best weight: 177 grams less (187 vs 364).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX682 compared to 21Mp Sony IMX230
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Samsung S5KGD1 vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 2160x1080.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 3W (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 10300mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 5300mAh).
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 3W (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A52s vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 FE vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A71 vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Ulefone Armor 3W related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3W
- Compare Blackview BV9500 vs Ulefone Armor 3W
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs Ulefone Armor 3W
- Compare Ulefone Armor 3W vs UMIDIGI F2
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6 vs Ulefone Armor 3W