Compare Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 85188 | 38695 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 5.71 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 1520x720 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 2 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Plastic frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | 161 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 149×71.3×8.4 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price | 81.41€ ($91.84) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Nokia 4.2’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Nokia 4.2 vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 6-7 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 85188 score points which is 120.15% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 175 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 50.86% faster. In "Multi-core" score 798 vs 603 (32.34% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 120.15% faster in the Antutu test (46493 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1520x720 vs 1280x720.
Why it is better not to take Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 12 grams less (149 vs 161).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 3000mAh (a difference of 2020mAh).
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Nokia 4.2 vs Samsung Galaxy A01
- Compare MiGueR Note 10 vs Nokia 4.2
- Compare Nokia 4.2 vs LG Q6
- Compare Nokia 4.2 vs Oppo A15
- Compare Nokia C30 vs Nokia 4.2
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus