0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR درهم SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare OUKITEL K9 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb

OUKITEL K9 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of OUKITEL K9 with Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb.

Name OUKITEL K9 Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
OUKITEL K9 Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Antutu benchmark 82987 38695
CPU MediaTek Helio P35 MediaTek MT6753
Diagonal size 7.12 " 5 "
Resolution 2244x1080 1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 4 Gb 3 Gb
Bezel-less Yes No
ROM 64 GB 16 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera 16 Mp 8 Mp
Camera Dual Camera Single camera
Sensor model Sony IMX298
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 2 Mp
Battery 6000 mAh 5020 mAh
Wireless charging No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC No No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes Yes
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 9.0 Android 7.0
Material Metal frame and plastic case Metal
Weight g 149 g
Dimensions mm 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm
  Price 145.82€ ($155.99) See Details Discontinued. View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb:

OUKITEL K9 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the OUKITEL K9’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp Sony IMX298 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name OUKITEL K9 Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Rear camera 16 Mp 8 Mp
Sensor model Sony IMX298
Flash Dual LED flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 2 Mp
Flash No No

OUKITEL K9 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the OUKITEL K9 vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name OUKITEL K9 Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Battery 6000 mAh 5020 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 6-7 days
Battery Life 3-4 days 3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode 10-12 hours 10-12 hours
Talk time 30 hours 30 hours
Fast charging Yes Yes
Wireless charging No

OUKITEL K9 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison. OUKITEL K9 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.

OUKITEL K9 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 82987 score points which is 114.46% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

OUKITEL K9
7.12 inches (2244x1080) Curved Glass / Helio P35 / 4Gb / 64GB / 16Mp Sony IMX298 / 6000mAh
145.82€
$155.99
 
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 5020mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

OUKITEL K9 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

OUKITEL K9 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 175 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 50.86% faster. In "Multi-core" score 642 vs 603 (6.47% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

OUKITEL K9
7.12 inches (2244x1080) Curved Glass / Helio P35 / 4Gb / 64GB / 16Mp Sony IMX298 / 6000mAh
145.82€
$155.99
 
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 5020mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

What is the difference between OUKITEL K9 and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL K9 (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 114.46% faster in the Antutu test (44292 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp Sony IMX298 compared to 8Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 2Mp .
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2244x1080 vs 1280x720.
  • More battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5020mAh (a difference of 980mAh).

Why it is better not to take OUKITEL K9 (disadvantages)

  • Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

  • Have fast charging supports.

OUKITEL K9 related comparisons

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.43/5 of 60
Frequent comparisons