Compare Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | Ulefone Armor 3WT | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 148199 | 38695 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P70 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 5.7 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2160x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 21 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX230 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 10300 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Metal |
| Weight | 364 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 164,8 x 79,2 x 18,2 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price | 269.01€ ($287.69) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Ulefone Armor 3WT’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 21Mp Sony IMX230 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 3WT | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 21 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX230 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 3WT | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 10300 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 5-6 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 3WT in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 148199 score points which is 282.99% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 3WT in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 320 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 175.86% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1475 vs 603 (144.61% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Ulefone Armor 3WT and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 3WT (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 282.99% faster in the Antutu test (109504 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 21Mp Sony IMX230 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2160x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 10300mAh vs 5020mAh (a difference of 5280mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 3WT (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 215 grams less (149 vs 364).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Ulefone Armor 3WT related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9800 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Plus vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus