Compare Vivo IQOO Neo 6/128Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | Vivo IQOO Neo 6/128Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 282199 | 38695 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.38 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 12 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 4420 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | 193 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 159,53 х 75,23 х 8,13 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo IQOO Neo 6/128Gb: Vivo X70 Pro+ 12/512GB - Compare Vivo IQOO Neo 8 - Compare Vivo IQOO 9 Pro 8/256GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Vivo IQOO Neo 6/128Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo IQOO Neo’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vivo IQOO Neo 6/128Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 12 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Vivo IQOO Neo 6/128Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo IQOO Neo vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vivo IQOO Neo 6/128Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4420 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
Vivo IQOO Neo 6/128Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO Neo 6/128Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 282199 score points which is 629.29% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo IQOO Neo 6/128Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO Neo 6/128Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 501 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 331.90% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1986 vs 603 (229.35% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo IQOO Neo 6/128Gb and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo IQOO Neo 6/128Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 629.29% faster in the Antutu test (243504 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 12Mp compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 12Mp vs 2Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1280x720.
Why it is better not to take Vivo IQOO Neo 6/128Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 44 grams less (149 vs 193).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4420mAh (a difference of 600mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Vivo IQOO Neo 6/128Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 vs Vivo IQOO Neo
- Compare Xiaomi Black Shark vs Vivo IQOO Neo
- Compare Vivo IQOO Neo vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
- Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 2 vs Vivo IQOO Neo
- Compare Cubot S208 vs Vivo IQOO Neo
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus