Compare Vivo X50e vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | Vivo X50e | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 328277 | 38695 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.44 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 4350 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | 200 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 162.05 × 74.97 × 8.8 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo X50e: Vivo IQOO Neo 8 Pro - Compare Vivo X Fold 12/512GB - Compare Vivo X90 12/256GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Vivo X50e vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo X50e’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX586 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vivo X50e | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Vivo X50e vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo X50e vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vivo X50e | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4350 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
Vivo X50e vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo X50e in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 328277 score points which is 748.37% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo X50e vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo X50e in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 675 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 481.90% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1958 vs 603 (224.71% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo X50e and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo X50e (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 748.37% faster in the Antutu test (289582 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX586 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1280x720.
Why it is better not to take Vivo X50e (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 51 grams less (149 vs 200).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4350mAh (a difference of 670mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Vivo X50e related comparisons
- Compare Oppo Reno 5 vs Vivo X50e
- Compare Vivo X50e vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
- Compare Oppo Realme X3 vs Vivo X50e
- Compare Vivo X50e vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Vivo X50e vs Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus