Compare Xiaomi Mi CC10 Pro vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Name | Xiaomi Mi CC10 Pro | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 603188 | 38695 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | MediaTek MT6753 |
Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 5 " |
Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1280x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | No |
ROM | 256 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
Rear camera | 108 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 2 Mp |
Battery | 4200 mAh | 5020 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | |
Network | 5 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 7.0 |
Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal |
Weight | g | 149 g |
Dimensions | mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Mi CC10 Pro: Xiaomi Redmi 10C 4/64GB non-NFC - Compare Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s 6/64Gb - Compare Xiaomi Civi 8/128Gb - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Xiaomi Mi CC10 Pro vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Mi CC10 Pro’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 108Mp Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Xiaomi Mi CC10 Pro | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 108 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX | |
Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 2 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Mi CC10 Pro vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Mi CC10 Pro vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Xiaomi Mi CC10 Pro | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Battery | 4200 mAh | 5020 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 10-12 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Wireless charging | No |
Xiaomi Mi CC10 Pro vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Mi CC10 Pro in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 603188 score points which is 1458.83% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Mi CC10 Pro vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Mi CC10 Pro in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 903 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 678.45% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3221 vs 603 (434.16% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Mi CC10 Pro and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Mi CC10 Pro (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1458.83% faster in the Antutu test (564493 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1280x720.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Mi CC10 Pro (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4200mAh (a difference of 820mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Xiaomi Mi CC10 Pro related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Mi CC10 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T
- Compare Xiaomi Mi Mix 2020 vs Xiaomi Mi CC10 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Mi CC10 Pro vs Huawei Honor Play 4T Pro
- Compare Leagoo M13 vs Xiaomi Mi CC10 Pro
- Compare Doogee S95 vs Xiaomi Mi CC10 Pro
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus