Compare ZTE Axon 30 Pro vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | ZTE Axon 30 Pro | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 758335 | 38695 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | 186 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.3 x 7.9 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all ZTE models here
Alternatives to the ZTE Axon 30 Pro: ZTE Nubia Z50 - Compare ZTE Red Magic 5s 16/256GB Global ROM - Compare ZTE Axon 40 Pro 8/128GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
ZTE Axon 30 Pro vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the ZTE Axon 30 Pro’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX682 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | ZTE Axon 30 Pro | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | |
| Flash | LED flash | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
ZTE Axon 30 Pro vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the ZTE Axon 30 Pro vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | ZTE Axon 30 Pro | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
ZTE Axon 30 Pro vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
ZTE Axon 30 Pro in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 758335 score points which is 1859.78% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
ZTE Axon 30 Pro vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
ZTE Axon 30 Pro in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 1128 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 872.41% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3769 vs 603 (525.04% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between ZTE Axon 30 Pro and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the ZTE Axon 30 Pro (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1859.78% faster in the Antutu test (719640 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX682 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1280x720.
Why it is better not to take ZTE Axon 30 Pro (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 37 grams less (149 vs 186).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4200mAh (a difference of 820mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
ZTE Axon 30 Pro related comparisons
- Compare ZTE Axon 30 Ultra vs ZTE Axon 30 Pro
- Compare ZTE Nubia Red Magic 6 Pro vs ZTE Axon 30 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S vs ZTE Axon 30 Pro
- Compare Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max vs ZTE Axon 30 Pro
- Compare Oppo Reno 4 Pro vs ZTE Axon 30 Pro
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus