Compare ZTE Axon 20 5G vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
| Name | ZTE Axon 20 5G | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 341669 | 37524 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.92 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2460x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 4120 mAh | 2800 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 6.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal and plastic |
| Weight | 198 g | 140 g |
| Dimensions | 172.1 × 77.9 × 7.9 mm | 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all ZTE models here
Alternatives to the ZTE Axon 20 5G: ZTE Axon 40 Ultra 8/128GB - Compare ZTE Nubia Red Magic 7 Pro Transformers Edition 12/256GB - Compare ZTE Axon 40 Ultra 12/256GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: |
ZTE Axon 20 5G vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the ZTE Axon 20 5G’s camera vs Vernee Thor’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX686 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | ZTE Axon 20 5G | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
| Flash | LED flash | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
ZTE Axon 20 5G vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the ZTE Axon 20 5G vs Vernee Thor, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | ZTE Axon 20 5G | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4120 mAh | 2800 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 20 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
ZTE Axon 20 5G vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
ZTE Axon 20 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 341669 score points which is 810.53% faster than the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb, which got 37524. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
ZTE Axon 20 5G vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
ZTE Axon 20 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 625 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 438.79% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1712 vs 604 (183.44% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between ZTE Axon 20 5G and Vernee Thor 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the ZTE Axon 20 5G (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 810.53% faster in the Antutu test (304145 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX686 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 4120mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 1320mAh).
Why it is better not to take ZTE Axon 20 5G (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 58 grams less (140 vs 198).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
ZTE Axon 20 5G related comparisons
- Compare ZTE Red Magic 5s vs ZTE Axon 20 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A80 vs ZTE Axon 20 5G
- Compare ZTE Axon 20 5G vs ZTE Nubia Red Magic
- Compare Doogee S58 Pro vs ZTE Axon 20 5G
- Compare Huawei P20 vs ZTE Axon 20 5G
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Vernee Thor vs Doogee X5 Max Pro