Compare Vivo NEX 3S 8/256GB vs Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb
| Name | Vivo NEX 3S 8/256GB | Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 592051 | 263117 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G |
| Diagonal size | 6.89 " | 6.47 " |
| Resolution | 2560x1080 | 2340x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 8 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| External memory | No | No |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 108 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Five cameras |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 32 Mp |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5260 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal frame and glass case |
| Weight | 217 g | 208 g |
| Dimensions | 167.44 × 76.14 × 9.4 mm | 157.8 x 74.2 x 9.7 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo NEX 3S 8/256GB: Vivo S16 Pro - Compare Vivo T2x - Compare Vivo iQOO Z1 8/256GB - Compare |
399.02€ ($430.09) See Details |
Vivo NEX 3S 8/256GB vs Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo NEX 3S’s camera vs Xiaomi CC9 Pro’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Samsung GW1 sensor and the 108Mp Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vivo NEX 3S 8/256GB | Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 108 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 32 Mp |
| Flash | LED flash | No |
Vivo NEX 3S 8/256GB vs Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo NEX 3S vs Xiaomi CC9 Pro, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vivo NEX 3S 8/256GB | Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5260 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Vivo NEX 3S 8/256GB vs Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo NEX 3S 8/256GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 592051 score points which is 125.01% faster than the Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb, which got 263117. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo NEX 3S 8/256GB vs Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo NEX 3S 8/256GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 924 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb which got 549, it is 68.31% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3449 vs 1771 (94.75% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo NEX 3S 8/256GB and Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo NEX 3S 8/256GB (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 125.01% faster in the Antutu test (328934 score difference).
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2560x1080 vs 2340x1080.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vivo NEX 3S 8/256GB (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 9 grams less (208 vs 217).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX compared to 64Mp Samsung GW1
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Samsung S5KGD1 vs 16Mp .
- More battery capacity: 5260mAh vs 4500mAh (a difference of 760mAh).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Vivo NEX 3S 8/256GB related comparisons
- Compare Meizu 17T vs Vivo NEX 3S
- Compare Vivo NEX 3 vs Vivo NEX 3S
- Compare Vivo NEX 3S vs Vivo IQOO 5
- Compare Vivo Z3x vs Vivo NEX 3S
- Compare Vivo Apex 2019 vs Vivo NEX 3S
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 9 vs Xiaomi CC9 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi CC9 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi 10X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi CC9 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
- Compare Xiaomi CC9 Pro vs Huawei Honor 10X
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Max vs Xiaomi CC9 Pro