Compare Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb vs Nokia 3.2 3/32GB
| Name | Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb | Nokia 3.2 3/32GB |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 147114 | 78446 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 |
| Diagonal size | 6.09 " | 6.26 " |
| Resolution | 1560x720 | 1520x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 4030 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | 174 g | 181 g |
| Dimensions | 153.5 x 71.9 x 8.5 mm | 159.4 x 76.2 x 8.6 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb: Xiaomi Poco F5 8/256GB - Compare Xiaomi Poco M5 6/128GB - Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 4/64Gb - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Nokia models here
Alternatives to the Nokia 3.2 3/32GB: Nokia 2.4 3/64GB - Compare Nokia 2.4 2/32GB - Compare Nokia 6.2 3/32Gb - Compare |
Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb vs Nokia 3.2 3/32GB: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi CC9e’s camera vs Nokia 3.2’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX586 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb | Nokia 3.2 3/32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb vs Nokia 3.2 3/32GB: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi CC9e vs Nokia 3.2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb | Nokia 3.2 3/32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4030 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb vs Nokia 3.2 3/32GB: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 147114 score points which is 87.54% faster than the Nokia 3.2 3/32GB, which got 78446. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb vs Nokia 3.2 3/32GB: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 310 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia 3.2 3/32GB which got 167, it is 85.63% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1340 vs 546 (145.42% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb and Nokia 3.2 3/32GB? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 87.54% faster in the Antutu test (68668 score difference).
- Best weight: 7 grams less (174 vs 181).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX586 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Samsung S5KGD1 vs 5Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1560x720 vs 1520x720.
- More battery capacity: 4030mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 30mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 3.2 3/32GB (advantages)
Why it is better not to take Nokia 3.2 3/32GB (disadvantages)
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi CC9e vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi K30 vs Xiaomi CC9e
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 vs Xiaomi CC9e
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro vs Xiaomi CC9e
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra vs Xiaomi CC9e
Nokia 3.2 3/32GB related comparisons
- Compare Nokia 2.4 vs Nokia 3.2
- Compare Nokia 5.4 vs Nokia 3.2
- Compare Nokia 3.2 vs Nokia 3.1
- Compare Nokia 4.2 vs Nokia 3.2
- Compare Nokia 3.2 vs Nokia 2.1