Compare Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
| Name | Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 287111 | 276448 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 |
| Diagonal size | 6.18 " | 5.2 " |
| Resolution | 2246х1080 | 2280x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | No |
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX363 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | 91 | |
| dxomark (photo) | 92 | |
| dxomark (video) | 90 | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 8.1 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and plastic case | Metal |
| Weight | 182 g | 139 g |
| Dimensions | 155,5 x 75,2 x 8,8 mm | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm |
| Price | 275.00€ ($317.61) See Details | 349.68€ ($403.86) See Details |
Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1’s camera vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp Sony IMX363 sensor and the 22.6Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX363 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 7-8 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 287111 score points which is 3.86% faster than the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, which got 276448. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 520 points score in "Single-core" of against the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact which got 501, it is 3.79% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2282 vs 1986 (14.90% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb and Sharp Aquos R2 Compact? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 3.86% faster in the Antutu test (10663 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 8Mp .
- More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 1500mAh).
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Best weight: 43 grams less (139 vs 182).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 22.6Mp compared to 12Mp Sony IMX363
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2280x1080 vs 2246х1080.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb related comparisons
- Compare Apple iPhone 7 Ref vs Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1
- Compare Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 vs UMIDIGI F1
- Compare Elephone S8 vs Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1
- Compare Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 vs Apple iPhone 6s Ref
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 8 vs Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact