Compare Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs OUKITEL C16 Pro
| Name | Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | OUKITEL C16 Pro |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 2986033 | 52117 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4) | MediaTek Helio A22 |
| Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 5.71 " |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 1520x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | OmniVision Light Hunter 800 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 2600 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 15 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and plastic case | Plastic |
| Weight | 206 g | 153 g |
| Dimensions | 160,3 × 74,9 × 8,4 mm | 146,4 x 70,3 x 9,5 mm |
| Price | 7478.49€ ($8733.21) See Details | 56.61€ ($66.11) See Details |
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs OUKITEL C16 Pro: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra’s camera vs OUKITEL C16 Pro’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp OmniVision Light Hunter 800 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | OUKITEL C16 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | OmniVision Light Hunter 800 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs OUKITEL C16 Pro: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs OUKITEL C16 Pro, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | OUKITEL C16 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 2600 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 1,5-2 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs OUKITEL C16 Pro: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 2986033 score points which is 5629.48% faster than the OUKITEL C16 Pro, which got 52117. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs OUKITEL C16 Pro: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 3251 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C16 Pro which got 161, it is 1919.25% faster. In "Multi-core" score 10177 vs 538 (1791.64% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra and OUKITEL C16 Pro? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 5629.48% faster in the Antutu test (2933916 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp OmniVision Light Hunter 800 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 3200x1440 vs 1520x720.
- More battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 2600mAh (a difference of 3400mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C16 Pro (advantages)
- Best weight: 53 grams less (153 vs 206).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C16 Pro (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi 14T Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
- Compare Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
- Compare ZTE Nubia Red Magic 10 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
- Compare Xiaomi 15 vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
- Compare Xiaomi 15 Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
OUKITEL C16 Pro related comparisons
- Compare Lenovo K5 Pro vs OUKITEL C16 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL C12 Pro vs OUKITEL C16 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL C16 Pro vs UMIDIGI A3S
- Compare Vernee M3 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro
- Compare Doogee N10 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro