Compare Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version
| Name | Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 2986033 | 2331783 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4) | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ |
| Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 6.67 " |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 2400x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 16 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 1024 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 50 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | OmniVision Light Hunter 800 | Sony IMX989 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 50 Mp |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 10600 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Network | 5 G | 5 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Material | Metal frame and plastic case | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 206 g | 450 g |
| Dimensions | 160,3 × 74,9 × 8,4 mm | 174.2 x 82.6 x 19.4 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra: Xiaomi Pocophone F2 Pro 8/256Gb - Compare Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite 6/64Gb - Compare Xiaomi Redmi 10C 4/64GB NFC - Compare |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Ulefone models here
Alternatives to the Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version: Ulefone Armor 8 - Compare Ulefone Power Armor 14 Pro 8/128GB - Compare Ulefone Armor 8 Pro 6/128Gb - Compare |
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra’s camera vs Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp OmniVision Light Hunter 800 sensor and the 50Mp Sony IMX989 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 50 Mp |
| Sensor model | OmniVision Light Hunter 800 | Sony IMX989 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 50 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 10600 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 8-9 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 2986033 score points which is 28.06% faster than the Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version, which got 2331783. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 3251 points score in "Single-core" of against the Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version which got 2671, it is 21.71% faster. In "Multi-core" score 10177 vs 6288 (61.85% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra and Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 28.06% faster in the Antutu test (654250 score difference).
- Best weight: 244 grams less (206 vs 450).
- Has a higher screen resolution: 3200x1440 vs 2400x1080.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 50Mp vs 20Mp .
- More battery capacity: 10600mAh vs 6000mAh (a difference of 4600mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi 14T Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
- Compare ZTE Nubia Red Magic 10 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
- Compare Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi 15 Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
- Compare Xiaomi 15 vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version related comparisons
- Compare Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version vs Ulefone Armor 6E
- Compare Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version vs Ulefone Armor X8
- Compare Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version vs Ulefone Armor X7 Pro
- Compare Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version vs Ulefone Armor 12S
- Compare Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra Thermal Version vs Ulefone Armor X5