MediaTek MT6737 vs UNISOC SC9832A
We compared the performance of processors and found out that MediaTek MT6737 is better than UNISOC SC9832A by 16.53%. It has 4 cores at 1.3 GHz and an Mali T720MP GPU versus 4 cores at 1.3 GHz with Mali 400MP. In the Antutu Benchmark test, MediaTek MT6737 results were faster than UNISOC SC9832A by 18.76%, scoring 41077 points vs 34588 marks. In the 3DMark test, it scored 69 points against 49 , which is 40.82% higher.
Its disadvantage is a TDP of 7W (its competitor has 5W), which means devices based on this chip will heat up more during games and other complex tasks. The speed of the built-in modems is identical (50 Mbps), so you won't notice a difference in your Internet connection.
In the tables below you will find more detailed information and you will be able to compare these CPUs, see the difference and be able to find which one is right for you.
MediaTek MT6737 vs UNISOC SC9832A Benchmarks and Rankings
Benchmark | MediaTek MT6737 | UNISOC SC9832A | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
Antutu | 41077 | 34588 | 18.76% |
Geekbench | 441/127 | 427/123 | 3.28% / 3.25% |
3Dmark | 69 | 49 | 40.82% |
MediaTek MT6737 vs UNISOC SC9832A Gaming Performance Test
Gaming test | MediaTek MT6737 | UNISOC SC9832A | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
PUBG: Mobile | 22 fps | 22 fps | - |
PUBG: New State | 13 fps | 15 fps | 15.38% |
Call of Duty: Mobile | 25 fps | 19 fps | 31.58% |
Fortnite | 0 fps | 3 fps | +Inf% |
Genshin Impact | 5 fps | 3 fps | 66.67% |
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 25 fps | 19 fps | 31.58% |
MediaTek MT6737 vs UNISOC SC9832A Specification
Processor name | MediaTek MT6737 | UNISOC SC9832A |
---|---|---|
Release Date | 05/23/2016 | 4/10/2016 |
CPU Architecture | 4 x Cortex-A53 1,3 GHz | 4 x Cortex-A7 1,3 GHz |
Number of Cores | 4 | 4 |
Clock Rate | 1.3 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
Chip technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
GPU | Mali T720MP | Mali 400MP |
The highest TDP | 7 | 5 |
Memory | 3 Gb | 2 Gb |
Features | MediaTek modem | UNISOC modem |
Upload Speed (up to) | 50 Mbps | 50 Mbps |