Compare AGM M2 vs Cectdigi T9900
| Name | AGM M2 | Cectdigi T9900 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | ||
| CPU | UNISOC 6531D | UNISOC 6531D |
| Diagonal size | 2.4 " | 2.8 " |
| Resolution | 320x240 | 320x240 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | ||
| RAM | Gb | Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | |
| ROM | GB | GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb | No |
| Rear camera | 1.3 Mp | 0.3 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | Mp | Mp |
| Battery | 1950 mAh | 15800 mAh |
| Wireless charging | ||
| Network | 2 G | 2 G |
| WiFi | No | |
| Bluetooth | Yes | |
| NFC | No | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | ||
| Notifications Led | No | |
| Fingerprint's scanner | No | |
| Operating system (OS) | ||
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 138 g | 155 g |
| Dimensions | 139 x 56,8 x 16 mm | 135 x 62 x 26 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all AGM models here
Alternatives to the AGM M2: AGM M5 - Compare AGM A9 4/64Gb - Compare AGM A9 4/32Gb - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Cectdigi models here
Alternatives to the Cectdigi T9900: |
AGM M2 vs Cectdigi T9900: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the AGM M2’s camera vs Cectdigi T9900’s camera, see the difference between the 1.3Mp sensor and the 0.3Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | AGM M2 | Cectdigi T9900 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 1.3 Mp | 0.3 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | No | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | Mp | Mp |
| Flash |
AGM M2 vs Cectdigi T9900: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the AGM M2 vs Cectdigi T9900, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | AGM M2 | Cectdigi T9900 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 1950 mAh | 15800 mAh |
| Type | Removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 8-9 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 20-30 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 7-8 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging |
AGM M2 vs Cectdigi T9900: Antutu benchmark comparison.
AGM M2 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 0 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cectdigi T9900, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
AGM M2 vs Cectdigi T9900: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
AGM M2 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cectdigi T9900 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between AGM M2 and Cectdigi T9900? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM M2 (advantages)
- Best weight: 17 grams less (138 vs 155).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 1.3Mp compared to 0.3Mp
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take AGM M2 (disadvantages)
- Does not have fast charging support
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cectdigi T9900 (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 15800mAh vs 1950mAh (a difference of 13850mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Cectdigi T9900 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- Have water resistant supports.
AGM M2 related comparisons
- Compare Rover X9 vs AGM M2
- Compare Suppu X6000 vs AGM M2
- Compare VKworld Diamond Z2 vs AGM M2
- Compare Uniwa V708 vs AGM M2
- Compare VKworld Stone V3 Plus vs AGM M2
Cectdigi T9900 related comparisons
- Compare Nomu S10 Pro vs Cectdigi T9900
- Compare VKworld New V3 vs Cectdigi T9900
- Compare Cectdigi T9900 vs Cectdigi T19