Compare IIIF150 B2021 vs AGM M2

IIIF150 B2021 vs AGM M2 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of IIIF150 B2021 with AGM M2.
Name	IIIF150 B2021	AGM M2

Antutu benchmark	102775
CPU	MediaTek Helio G25	UNISOC 6531D
Diagonal size	5.86 "	2.4 "
Resolution	1520x720	320x240
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10
RAM	6 Gb	Gb
Bezel-less	Yes
ROM	64 GB	GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera	13 Mp	1.3 Mp
Camera	Four cameras	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	8 Mp	Mp
Battery	8000 mAh	1950 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	4 G	2 G
WiFi	Yes	No
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	Yes	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	No	No
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 10.0 (Q)
Material	Plastic	Plastics and rubber
Weight	315 g	138 g
Dimensions	158 x 78 x 18 mm	139 x 56,8 x 16 mm
Price	118.85€ ($137.75) See Details	Discontinued. View all AGM models here Alternatives to the AGM M2: AGM Glory G1 SE - Compare AGM H MAX - Compare AGM M5 - Compare

IIIF150 B2021 vs AGM M2: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the IIIF150 B2021’s camera vs AGM M2’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 1.3Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	IIIF150 B2021	AGM M2
Rear camera	13 Mp	1.3 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	LED flash	No
Front (selfie) camera	8 Mp	Mp
Flash	No

IIIF150 B2021 vs AGM M2: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the IIIF150 B2021 vs AGM M2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	IIIF150 B2021	AGM M2
Battery	8000 mAh	1950 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	8-9 days	5-6 days
Battery Life	3-4 days	3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode	14-15 hours	7-8 hours
Talk time	30 hours	25 hours
Fast charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging	No

IIIF150 B2021 vs AGM M2: Antutu benchmark comparison.

IIIF150 B2021 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 102775 score points which is 100.00% faster than the AGM M2, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

IIIF150 B2021

5.86 inches (1520x720) Curved Glass / Helio G25 / 6Gb / 64GB / 13Mp / 8000mAh

118.85€

$137.75

102775

AGM M2

2.4 inches (320x240) Glass / 6531D / 1.3Mp / 1950mAh

0.00€

$0.00

IIIF150 B2021 vs AGM M2: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

IIIF150 B2021 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 172 points score in "Single-core" of against the AGM M2 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 967 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

IIIF150 B2021

5.86 inches (1520x720) Curved Glass / Helio G25 / 6Gb / 64GB / 13Mp / 8000mAh

118.85€

$137.75

172 / 967

AGM M2

2.4 inches (320x240) Glass / 6531D / 1.3Mp / 1950mAh

0.00€

$0.00

0 / 0

What is the difference between IIIF150 B2021 and AGM M2? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 B2021 (advantages)

Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 1.3Mp
NFC supports.
Has a higher screen resolution: 1520x720 vs 320x240.
More battery capacity: 8000mAh vs 1950mAh (a difference of 6050mAh).
Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take IIIF150 B2021 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM M2 (advantages)

Best weight: 177 grams less (138 vs 315).

Why it is better not to take AGM M2 (disadvantages)

Does not support NFC.
Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

Have water resistant supports.
Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

IIIF150 B2021 related comparisons

AGM M2 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 178

Frequent comparisons