Compare AGM M2 vs Star C1000
| Name | AGM M2 | Star C1000 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | ||
| CPU | UNISOC 6531D | |
| Diagonal size | 2.4 " | " |
| Resolution | 320x240 | 960x540 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | |
| RAM | Gb | Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | |
| ROM | GB | 8 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb | |
| Rear camera | 1.3 Mp | Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | Mp | Mp |
| Battery | 1950 mAh | 2050 mAh |
| Wireless charging | ||
| Network | 2 G | G |
| Sim cards | ||
| WiFi | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | |
| NFC | No | |
| Navigation (Positioning) | ||
| Notifications Led | No | |
| Fingerprint's scanner | No | |
| Operating system (OS) | ||
| Material | Plastics and rubber | |
| Weight | 138 g | g |
| Dimensions | 139 x 56,8 x 16 mm | mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all AGM models here
Alternatives to the AGM M2: AGM A9 4/32Gb - Compare AGM X3 8/64Gb - Compare AGM H5 - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Star models here
Alternatives to the Star C1000: |
AGM M2 vs Star C1000: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the AGM M2’s camera vs Star C1000’s camera, see the difference between the 1.3Mp sensor and the Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | AGM M2 | Star C1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 1.3 Mp | Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | No | |
| Front (selfie) camera | Mp | Mp |
| Flash |
AGM M2 vs Star C1000: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the AGM M2 vs Star C1000, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | AGM M2 | Star C1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 1950 mAh | 2050 mAh |
| Type | Removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | |
| Working hours in hard mode | 7-8 hours | |
| Talk time | 25 hours | |
| Fast charging | No | |
| Wireless charging |
AGM M2 vs Star C1000: Antutu benchmark comparison.
AGM M2 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 0 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Star C1000, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
AGM M2 vs Star C1000: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
AGM M2 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Star C1000 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between AGM M2 and Star C1000? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM M2 (advantages)
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take AGM M2 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Star C1000 (advantages)
- Has a higher screen resolution: 960x540 vs 320x240.
- More battery capacity: 2050mAh vs 1950mAh (a difference of 100mAh).
Why it is better not to take Star C1000 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
AGM M2 related comparisons
- Compare Rover X9 vs AGM M2
- Compare Suppu X6000 vs AGM M2
- Compare VKworld Diamond Z2 vs AGM M2
- Compare Uniwa V708 vs AGM M2
- Compare VKworld Stone V3 Plus vs AGM M2
Star C1000 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee M2
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Meizu M6 Note
- Compare UMIDIGI S2 Pro vs Vernee M2
- Compare LeEco Cool1 vs Vernee M2
- Compare LeEco Cool1 vs Meizu M6 Note