Compare Cubot King Kong vs AGM M2
Name | Cubot King Kong | AGM M2 |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Antutu benchmark | 21244 | |
CPU | MediaTek MT6580 | UNISOC 6531D |
Diagonal size | 5 " | 2.4 " |
Resolution | 1280x720 | 320x240 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | |
RAM | 2 Gb | Gb |
Bezel-less | No | |
ROM | 16 GB | GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
Rear camera | 8 Mp | 1.3 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | Mp |
Battery | 4400 mAh | 1950 mAh |
Wireless charging | ||
Network | 3 G | 2 G |
WiFi | Yes | No |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | No | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS | |
Notifications Led | Yes | No |
Fingerprint's scanner | No | No |
Operating system (OS) | Android 7.0 | |
Material | Plastic | Plastics and rubber |
Weight | 220 g | 138 g |
Dimensions | 154 x 79,2 x 11,2 mm | 139 x 56,8 x 16 mm |
Price | 92.16€ ($106.44) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all AGM models here
Alternatives to the AGM M2: AGM A10 3/32Gb - Compare AGM G2 - Compare AGM Glory G1S - Compare |
Cubot King Kong vs AGM M2: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Cubot King Kong’s camera vs AGM M2’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 1.3Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Cubot King Kong | AGM M2 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 8 Mp | 1.3 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | Dual LED flash | No |
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | Mp |
Flash | No |
Cubot King Kong vs AGM M2: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot King Kong vs AGM M2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Cubot King Kong | AGM M2 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 4400 mAh | 1950 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 7-8 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
Fast charging | No | No |
Wireless charging |
Cubot King Kong vs AGM M2: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Cubot King Kong in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 21244 score points which is 100.00% faster than the AGM M2, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Cubot King Kong vs AGM M2: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Cubot King Kong in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 72 points score in "Single-core" of against the AGM M2 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 258 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Cubot King Kong and AGM M2? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 8Mp compared to 1.3Mp
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1280x720 vs 320x240.
- More battery capacity: 4400mAh vs 1950mAh (a difference of 2450mAh).
Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM M2 (advantages)
- Best weight: 82 grams less (138 vs 220).
Why it is better not to take AGM M2 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Cubot King Kong related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Cubot King Kong
- Compare Nomu S10 vs Cubot King Kong
- Compare Blackview R6 vs Cubot King Kong
- Compare Cubot King Kong vs Doogee S30
- Compare ZOJI Z7 vs Cubot King Kong
AGM M2 related comparisons
- Compare Rover X9 vs AGM M2
- Compare Suppu X6000 vs AGM M2
- Compare VKworld Diamond Z2 vs AGM M2
- Compare BLUBOO Mini vs AGM M2
- Compare Uniwa V708 vs AGM M2