Compare Cubot Pocket vs Cubot S168
| Name | Cubot Pocket | Cubot S168 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 137655 | |
| CPU | UNISOC Tiger T310 | MediaTek MT6582 |
| Diagonal size | 4 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 1080x540 | 960x540 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 1 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 64 GB | 8 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb | |
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 1900 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | G |
| Sim cards | ||
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | |
| NFC | Yes | |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | |
| Notifications Led | No | |
| Fingerprint's scanner | No | |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | |
| Material | Plastic | |
| Weight | 149 g | g |
| Dimensions | 119 x 58 x 12.5 mm | mm |
| Price | 81.16€ ($87.24) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot S168: Cubot J5 - Compare Cubot X20 Pro - Compare Cubot King Kong 7 8/128GB - Compare |
Cubot Pocket vs Cubot S168: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Cubot Pocket’s camera vs Cubot S168’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Cubot Pocket | Cubot S168 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | LED flash | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No |
Cubot Pocket vs Cubot S168: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot Pocket vs Cubot S168, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Cubot Pocket | Cubot S168 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 1900 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | |
| Working hours in hard mode | 7-8 hours | |
| Talk time | 25 hours | |
| Fast charging | No | |
| Wireless charging | No |
Cubot Pocket vs Cubot S168: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Cubot Pocket in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 137655 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot S168, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Cubot Pocket vs Cubot S168: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Cubot Pocket in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 295 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot S168 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1012 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Cubot Pocket and Cubot S168? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot Pocket (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp compared to 8Mp
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1080x540 vs 960x540.
- More battery capacity: 3000mAh vs 1900mAh (a difference of 1100mAh).
Why it is better not to take Cubot Pocket (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot S168 (advantages)
Why it is better not to take Cubot S168 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Cubot Pocket related comparisons
- Compare Cubot Pocket vs Cubot King Kong Mini 2
- Compare Cubot Pocket vs Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro
- Compare Cubot KingKong Mini 3 vs Cubot Pocket
- Compare Cubot Pocket 3 vs Cubot Pocket
- Compare Cubot Pocket vs Soyes XS12
Cubot S168 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 vs Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 6A vs Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 vs Nokia X6
- Compare LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) vs Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite